Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this solo episode, Kyle Grieve dives deep into Michael Mauboussin's groundbreaking insights from The Consilient Observer, exploring how investors can dramatically improve their decision-making processes. (03:00) The discussion centers around combating noise, bias, and information gaps that plague investment forecasting, while examining four crucial investing myths that many professionals fall victim to. Grieve unpacks Mauboussin's revolutionary BIN framework (Bias, Information, Noise) and reveals why traditional valuation metrics like P/E ratios are becoming less reliable in today's intangible-asset-heavy economy.
• Main theme: How to eliminate noise and bias from investment decisions while understanding the true economics behind GAAP accounting limitations and modern business valuations.
Kyle Grieve is the host of The Investor's Podcast and a dedicated student of value investing principles. He specializes in analyzing complex investment frameworks and translating academic research into actionable insights for serious investors. Kyle is known for his deep dives into legendary investors' strategies and his ability to synthesize multiple perspectives into clear, practical guidance.
Mauboussin's BIN acronym stands for Bias, Information, and Noise - the three primary sources of forecasting errors. (03:00) Noise is the most critical factor, calculated as the difference between sample outcomes divided by their average. In a study of 50 accountants calculating taxes for a family earning $132,000, answers varied from $10,000 to $21,000 - a noise index over 20%. The market functions as a "gigantic noise device" where sentiment creates variability between 52-week highs and lows. To reduce noise, combine independent judgments from diverse perspectives, use algorithmic approaches like checklists, and implement the mediating assessment protocol (MAP) which defines attributes, evaluates criteria, and makes decisions based on systematic scoring.
Checklists serve as powerful algorithms that outperform experts across multiple domains by ensuring thoroughness and consistency. (07:02) They force research into less interesting but high-impact areas like management history, illuminate knowledge gaps requiring deeper analysis, build conviction through comprehensive understanding, and help develop variant perceptions by doing work others avoid. For stock analysis, checklists might include growth metrics, financial health, capital efficiency, insider ownership, and management talent assessment. The key is honest self-assessment - if you can't answer checklist questions confidently, either the business isn't suitable or more research is required.
The shift from tangible to intangible investments has made traditional accounting misleading. (24:15) In 1977, tangible investments were twice intangible investments; today, intangible investments are 1.5 times tangible investments. GAAP forces intangible investments onto income statements as expenses rather than balance sheet assets, creating "GAAP losers" - profitable companies that appear unprofitable. Research from 1980-2018 showed GAAP losers delivered 11.5% returns versus 7.5% for winners and 2.3% for real losers. Amazon exemplifies this: in 2014, its GAAP operating margin was 0.2%, but adding back R&D revealed an 11% adjusted operating margin, demonstrating hidden economic value.
Most investors drastically overestimate business success rates. (55:58) The half-life of a public company is only ten years, with just 5% of listed companies surviving fifty years or longer. About 60% of companies underperform one-month treasury bills, while only 2% of stocks account for 90% of market wealth creation. Even Warren Buffett has sold 300+ stocks throughout his career, proving most investments are "rentals" rather than forever holds. Understanding these base rates tempers optimistic forecasts and grounds investment expectations in reality. This knowledge helps investors position appropriately for the rare nature of exceptional business performance.
The Rule of 40 states that healthy businesses should have combined revenue growth percentage and EBITDA margins meeting or exceeding 40%. (52:29) This framework helps identify truly valuable companies beyond simple multiples. Two companies trading at 30x EV/EBITDA with 20% revenue growth appear similar, but one with 10% declining margins (total: 30%) differs significantly from one with 20% improving margins (total: 40%). The direction of margin trends matters more than current levels - a company approaching the Rule of 40 from below (improving from -20% to 0% margins) may represent better value than one declining from above. This metric works across industries, not just technology, for assessing sustainable growth prospects.