Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In the final episode of 20VC's weekly show, Harry Stebbings hosts Jason Lemkin and Rory O'Driscoll for a comprehensive "Big Fat Quiz of the Year" covering the standout achievements and predictions for 2026. The trio awards recognition for best founder, fund, and product of 2025, with Dario Amodei of Anthropic taking founder honors for Claude's transformative impact on AI coding and productivity tools (05:16). They analyze breakout companies like Databricks and Eleven Labs, discuss the surprising talent wars that reshaped hiring practices, and debate which public tech stocks will dominate in 2026. Looking ahead, they predict SpaceX, Canva, Databricks, and Anthropic as the most likely IPO candidates, while warning of potential AI-driven unemployment backlash (01:02:29).
Host of 20VC podcast and venture capitalist, known for building one of the most prominent venture capital podcasts globally. Stebbings has established himself as a leading voice in the startup ecosystem through his extensive interviews with founders and investors.
Founder and General Partner at SaaStr, one of the leading B2B software communities and investment firms. Lemkin previously founded EchoSign (acquired by Adobe) and has become a prominent voice in SaaS investing and entrepreneurship education.
Venture capitalist with extensive experience in European and global markets. O'Driscoll brings a critical analytical perspective to venture investing and has been involved in numerous successful technology investments throughout his career.
The panelists highlighted how Claude 3.5 and later models fundamentally changed software development, enabling products like Cursor, Lovable, and Replit to reach massive scale quickly (05:16). Jason emphasized how tools like Eleven Labs went from a $2,000 two-week process to a $30 ten-minute solution for voice generation (26:43). This represents a paradigm shift where AI doesn't just provide incremental improvements but creates step-function value propositions that justify premium pricing and rapid adoption.
The biggest surprise of 2025 was the extreme lengths companies went to acquire AI talent, with individuals receiving $100 million packages and companies being acquired for $14 billion primarily for their teams (28:23). Rory noted this wasn't just about money but represented a complete breakdown of traditional hiring conventions and social norms (29:39). This trend reflects the reality that when companies are spending $75 billion on CapEx, investing $5 billion to ensure the right people are deploying that capital becomes rational.
The discussion revealed a critical distinction between companies that talk about AI and those that can charge for it (42:23). Notion successfully doubled their pricing by moving users from $10 to $20 monthly plans through AI features, while companies like Adobe claimed $5 billion in "AI-influenced revenue" without meaningful pricing uplift (45:51). The key insight is that bundling AI for free reduces operating margins by 10% without revenue expansion, making pricing discipline essential for AI monetization.
Jason observed that venture capital no longer has a ceiling, fundamentally changing industry mathematics (30:27). Companies can now go from $2-8 billion valuations in weeks, and trillion-dollar IPOs are expected in 2026 (30:01). This creates a dynamic where early-stage ownership optimization becomes less relevant when later-stage deployment of significant capital can yield comparable returns, reshaping how investors think about entry points and position sizing.
The panelists predicted that any increase in unemployment will trigger massive AI backlash because industry leaders have already "admitted to the crime" by publicly stating AI will displace jobs (01:03:02). Even if unemployment rises due to unrelated factors like tariffs or economic cycles, AI companies will bear the blame because they've positioned themselves as job disruptors (01:03:11). This represents a significant political and social risk that could impact AI adoption regardless of the technology's actual employment impact.