Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this captivating episode, Harry Stebbings interviews Ev Randle, the newest General Partner at Benchmark, one of venture capital's most prestigious firms. (05:25) Ev shares invaluable investing lessons learned from legends like Peter Thiel, Mary Meeker, and Mamoon Hamid, while discussing his transition from growth-stage investing to Benchmark's craft-focused approach. (14:36) The conversation dives deep into the AI landscape, with bold predictions about OpenAI becoming a trillion-dollar company and the need for new frameworks to evaluate AI companies. (22:27) Throughout the episode, Ev provides candid insights on venture capital's evolution, the challenges facing mega funds, and why Benchmark's small-team, high-conviction approach may be perfectly positioned for today's market.
Ev Randle is the newest General Partner at Benchmark, one of venture capital's most prestigious firms. Before joining Benchmark, Ev was a Partner at Kleiner Perkins and previously held investor roles at Founders Fund and Bond. He brings extensive growth-stage investing experience to Benchmark's team, having worked on significant investments including SpaceX at a $150 billion valuation.
Harry Stebbings is the host of 20VC, one of the world's leading venture capital podcasts. He has been interviewing top investors and founders for over a decade, building one of the most respected platforms in the venture ecosystem.
Peter Thiel's genius lies not just in his investments but in how he structures his firm to constantly test conviction. (07:06) At Founders Fund, employees can personally invest alongside firm investments, creating a natural conviction test. If you won't put your own money into a deal, why should your LPs? This framework forces investors to move beyond theoretical analysis to genuine conviction. Successful investing requires skin in the game - when your personal wealth is at stake alongside institutional capital, you naturally become more selective and conviction-driven in your decision-making process.
Mary Meeker's approach to quantitative analysis reveals a crucial insight: the best investors use numbers to see stories, not just spreadsheets. (06:16) She doesn't just model DoorDash's growth rates; she visualizes 20% of households ordering monthly and understands what that means culturally. This qualitative application of quantitative data allows investors to see eight to ten year horizons clearly. The key is using financial models as a lens to understand human behavior and market evolution, rather than getting trapped in purely mathematical frameworks.
Traditional SaaS metrics don't apply to AI companies, creating a dangerous evaluation gap. (22:27) Instead of focusing on 80% gross margins, investors should prioritize absolute gross profit dollars per customer. An AI company with 50% margins and $500,000 gross profit per customer dramatically outperforms a SaaS company with 75% margins and $200,000 gross profit per customer. This shift reflects AI's ability to capture portions of labor budgets rather than just software budgets, creating fundamentally larger economic relationships with customers.
Mamoon Hamid's most valuable lesson centers on experiential learning: you must see excellence up close to spot it in the wild. (06:06) Without early exposure to A+ management teams and exceptional founders, investors lack the calibration to recognize greatness later. This principle extends beyond pattern recognition to developing intuitive taste around the intersection of people, product, and market. The best investors deliberately seek exposure to the highest-performing companies and founders, using these experiences as a benchmark for future investment decisions.
Despite popular belief that AI has shifted competitive advantages to distribution and data, technology remains the fundamental moat. (32:06) Building exceptional AI products requires vastly different skills than SaaS development, creating natural talent scarcity. The complexity of integrating LLMs effectively, improving them through usage, and creating workflows that outshine lab applications represents a technical moat disguised as talent scarcity. Distribution enables you to build differentiated technology, but the technology itself - executed by rare talent - creates sustainable competitive advantages.