Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
This episode features a compelling conversation between Scott Galloway and historian Heather Cox Richardson about the state of American democracy in the wake of the "No Kings" protests. (10:00) Richardson, who is having a moment as one of America's most influential political voices through her Substack newsletter, provides historical context for current events and discusses what these protests reveal about American democracy. The conversation covers the erosion of moral leadership among elites, the redefinition of patriotism, and how historical patterns can help us understand today's political landscape.
Host of the Prop G Pod and professor of marketing at NYU Stern School of Business. Galloway is a serial entrepreneur, bestselling author, and one of the most influential voices in business and technology today.
Professor of history at Boston College and author of "Democracy Awakening: Notes on the State of America." She is the voice behind the widely-read Substack newsletter "Letters from an American," where she synthesizes American political and economic history with current events, reaching millions of readers daily.
Galloway opens the episode with a profound realization that has transformed his approach to public commentary. (06:06) He explains how he's learned that "every issue does not demand your judgment" and "you do not have to have an opinion on everything." This insight came to him during the No Kings protests when he initially felt pressured to provide commentary but then realized he didn't need to weigh in on every major event. This represents a mature approach to thought leadership - recognizing that restraint and domain expertise matter more than having hot takes on every trending topic. For professionals, this teaches the value of focusing your energy on areas where you can add genuine value rather than trying to be an expert on everything.
Richardson identifies the key components that make protests effective in creating lasting change. (19:14) She emphasizes that nonviolence is "so key in America" and highlights how the No Kings protests succeeded because they emphasized "nonviolence, joy, artistic expression, and crucially made sure the protests happened during daylight." The protests also succeeded because they created space where "many, many people could see themselves" rather than being divisive. This framework applies beyond protests to any movement seeking broad social change - inclusivity, positivity, and strategic timing matter more than anger or confrontation.
When Galloway asks about the effectiveness of national economic strikes, Richardson provides historical context showing why targeted boycotts work while general strikes typically fail. (23:33) She explains that targeted strikes "work incredibly well" while general strikes "do not historically tend to work well" because "when you start to issue a general strike, that means that people don't get their medicine or people don't get food." The lesson for professionals and activists is that precision and specificity in your actions - whether boycotts, campaigns, or business strategies - are more effective than broad, unfocused efforts that may alienate potential allies.
Galloway delivers a scathing critique of business leaders who have failed to show backbone during challenging times. (30:09) He argues that tech titans and S&P 500 leaders, despite being "pretty bulletproof" financially, have shown "shocking" cowardice by not standing up for democratic principles. He sees this as both a moral failure and a missed commercial opportunity, suggesting that companies could benefit by taking principled stands. Richardson connects this to historical patterns, comparing modern tech leaders to 19th-century robber barons who believed their success made them inherently superior. This reveals an important lesson about leadership: true leadership means doing the right thing when it's difficult, not just when it's profitable or safe.
When asked about her remarkable success on Substack, Richardson reveals that she has "zero strategy" and simply does what she loves. (72:56) She explains that "everything that I have done, I have done because it interested me, and I loved it" and warns that "the minute you start to try and guess what other people want, you've lost what it is that makes you unique." Her approach of writing 1,200+ words daily without asking for money, focusing purely on understanding the world, has built a massive following. The key insight is that authentic passion and consistent quality work, rather than calculated strategy, often creates the most sustainable and meaningful success.