Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov dissect Trump's sweeping anti-immigration crackdown, including the firing of nearly 100 immigration judges and freezing of visas, examining how policy driven by panic rather than evidence creates widespread dysfunction. (05:25) They also dive deep into a viral post arguing the real poverty line isn't $32,000 but closer to $140,000 for families caught in the "Valley of Death," and explore Oxford's choice of "rage bait" as Word of the Year, reflecting on how outrage has become the internet's favorite currency and its impact on American politics and mental health. (24:48)
• **Main Themes:** Immigration policy dysfunction, economic inequality and the true cost of middle-class life, and the role of algorithmic rage in shaping political discourseProfessor of Marketing at NYU Stern School of Business and serial entrepreneur who has founded multiple companies. He is a bestselling author and frequently appears on major media outlets as a commentator on business, technology, and economics.
Political strategist and co-host of Fox News' "The Five," holding a PhD in political science. She is also an author and provides political commentary across various media platforms, known for her moderate Democratic perspectives.
Galloway emphasizes that when immigration decisions are driven by political crisis rather than evidence, the entire system breaks down. (05:25) The current approach of firing immigration judges and blanket visa freezes creates widespread dysfunction affecting everything from businesses to families already in legal proceedings. The hosts point out that 36% of agricultural workers and 27% of ground maintenance workers are undocumented, meaning mass deportation efforts could trigger significant inflation as these workers are willing to work at lower rates. A thoughtful immigration system should evaluate people across the spectrum - from agricultural workers to healthcare professionals to tech entrepreneurs - but instead of targeted enforcement against employers who hire undocumented workers, the administration is separating families and detaining American citizens by mistake.
The federal poverty line, based on 1960s calculations using food costs, no longer reflects economic reality since food has dropped from one-third to 13% of household expenses. (24:48) Michael Green's viral post suggesting $140,000 as the new poverty line sparked important conversations about families caught in the "Valley of Death" - earning too much for government aid but not enough for comfortable living. While $140,000 may not be poverty, the underlying point is valid: housing, transportation, healthcare, and childcare costs have skyrocketed. In Manhattan, documented full-time childcare now costs around $150,000 annually, and 11% of household spending goes to childcare in states like New Mexico. The hosts suggest updating the poverty calculation to reflect modern realities, potentially around $82,000, and implementing universal programs like childcare and healthcare to help families reach economic stability.
Rather than expanding welfare programs that create bureaucratic inefficiencies, Galloway advocates for targeted services that create economies of scale. (30:42) Universal childcare, nationalized healthcare, and expanded Pell grants can effectively raise a family earning $50,000-$60,000 to the equivalent of $80,000 without creating dependency. He argues for a $25 minimum wage (where it would be if it had kept pace with inflation and productivity) combined with government services that address the biggest expense categories. This approach avoids the moral hazard of debt forgiveness programs while providing the structural support families need. The key is ensuring these programs create genuine economic mobility rather than just expanding the government bureaucracy that often absorbs resources without effectively helping the intended beneficiaries.
The economic incentive structure of major tech platforms has fundamentally changed human behavior and political discourse. (48:00) From 1945 to Google's introduction, advertising connected positive associations to products, but social media discovered that rage keeps people engaged longer, generating more ad revenue. Studies show that US media headlines denoting anger increased 104% from 2000 to 2019, while headlines expressing fear, sadness, and disgust increased by 150%, 54%, and 29% respectively. Each additional negative word in a headline increases click-through rates by over two percentage points. The hosts describe how this creates a "doom loop" where even thoughtful content creators must use inflammatory headlines to get algorithmic attention, gradually shaping their own thinking and making them more confrontational to generate engagement.
Both hosts acknowledge struggling with social media addiction despite understanding its harmful effects. (54:57) Tarlov admits her children know how important her phone is to her, with her daughter running to remind her when she forgets it, creating concerning psychological dependencies. Galloway describes recognizing how algorithms were shaping his views to be more confrontational and making a conscious decision to post content he knows will get negative responses rather than let engagement metrics drive his thinking. The key insight is that "you become where you spend your time" - the platforms are literally rewiring brains to be more hostile toward fellow Americans. They suggest that the biggest "therapy bomb" in history would be raising minimum wage, building affordable housing, and regulating big tech rather than expecting individual therapy to solve systemic problems created by algorithmic manipulation.