Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this comprehensive discussion between Scott Galloway and Ian Bremmer, the conversation spans from Trump's 55-minute speech at the UN General Assembly to global power dynamics and active conflict zones. The episode reveals how America has become less interested in leading its own international architecture while other nations prefer maintaining existing systems. (01:27) Key topics include the UN's evolving role in global diplomacy, promising developments in Middle East peace negotiations, and shifting US strategies in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The discussion emphasizes how traditional assumptions about American foreign policy leadership are being challenged in an era of unprecedented political uncertainty.
Scott Galloway is a clinical professor of marketing at NYU Stern School of Business, serial entrepreneur, and bestselling author. He founded multiple companies including L2 Inc and Red Envelope, and is known for his sharp analysis of business, technology, and economic trends through his Prop G podcast and various media appearances.
Ian Bremmer is the president and founder of Eurasia Group, the world's leading political risk research and consulting firm, and GZERO Media. A renowned expert on global political risk, Bremmer has authored several books on international relations and regularly appears as a foreign policy analyst across major media outlets. This marks his fourteenth appearance on the Prop G podcast.
The United States is fundamentally changing its approach to international leadership, moving away from wanting to lead its own post-WWII architecture. (06:47) Rather than being in decline while trying to maintain power, America is actively choosing to step back from traditional leadership roles and seeking to change international rules to benefit itself more directly. This represents a historic shift where the incumbent superpower wants to alter the global system it created, while other nations, including China, prefer maintaining existing structures. For ambitious professionals, this suggests that traditional assumptions about American reliability and consistency in international business and diplomatic relationships may no longer hold true.
Despite widespread criticism, the United Nations serves critical functions that would need to be recreated if it didn't exist. (14:00) The organization provides the only regular forum where American and Russian officials maintain direct communication, serves as a platform where smaller nations can engage meaningfully with global powers, and facilitates breakthrough diplomatic achievements like the Black Sea grain deal during the Russia-Ukraine conflict. (11:24) For professionals in international business or policy, understanding that informal diplomatic networks and continuous dialogue often matter more than formal enforcement mechanisms can inform better global relationship strategies.
Real diplomatic progress occurs when parties face genuine consequences for inaction, as demonstrated in recent Middle East negotiations. (27:48) The UAE's threat to leave the Abraham Accords if Israel proceeded with West Bank annexation created the first meaningful consequence Israel faced, leading to immediate policy changes. This principle extends beyond international relations - in any negotiation or relationship, sustainable agreements require that all parties have something meaningful to lose if they don't cooperate.
When dealing with economic warfare or strategic pressure, attacking production capacity proves more effective than trying to reduce demand. (48:49) Ukraine's success in damaging 17% of Russia's oil refining capacity has had more strategic impact than attempts to convince other countries to stop buying Russian oil. For business leaders and strategists, this suggests focusing resources on disrupting competitors' ability to produce or deliver rather than only trying to win customers away from them.
The consolidation of executive authority through appointments of loyalists represents a fundamental shift in governmental checks and balances. (63:39) Bremmer identifies the appointment of Attorney General Pam Bondi as a "meaningful win for Trump in consolidating authority against political opposition." For professionals in regulated industries or those working with government agencies, understanding how institutional independence affects predictability and rule of law becomes crucial for long-term planning and risk management.