Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
This China Decode episode explores three critical aspects of China's economic and tech strategy. The hosts first examine Moore Threads' explosive 400% IPO surge on its first trading day, representing China's aggressive push to build a homegrown GPU alternative to NVIDIA. (03:14) The discussion then shifts to China's persistently undervalued renminbi, which remains 20-30% below fair value according to various metrics, fueling massive trade surpluses that could reach $1.2 trillion in 2024. (17:14) Finally, they interview Patrick McGee, author of "Apple in China," who reveals how Apple's hardware dependency has made it increasingly captive to Chinese manufacturing, creating what he calls the "capture of the world's greatest company." (26:52)
Co-host of China Decode podcast and experienced China market analyst. Han provides in-depth analysis of Chinese financial markets, trade dynamics, and economic policy, bringing expertise in currency markets and China's economic rebalancing efforts.
Co-host of China Decode and seasoned journalist with extensive experience covering China's economy. Kynge offers historical context and comparative analysis, drawing on decades of reporting on China's economic transformation and global integration.
Author of "Apple in China: The Capture of the World's Greatest Company" and journalist with deep expertise in technology supply chains. McGee spent years investigating Apple's manufacturing dependencies and China's industrial capabilities, providing unique insights into tech-geopolitical dynamics.
Moore Threads' explosive 425% IPO surge demonstrates China's commitment to building domestic alternatives to Western technology, particularly in critical areas like AI chips. (03:14) The company, founded by a former NVIDIA China head who worked there for 15 years, received expedited IPO approval in just 88 days—a Shanghai Stock Exchange record. Despite being unprofitable and under US sanctions, the massive investor enthusiasm reflects China's $100 billion "Big Fund" semiconductor investment strategy and the country's $200+ billion annual chip market. This represents a systematic approach to reducing dependence on foreign technology suppliers, particularly as China faces continued US export controls.
China's renminbi remains 20-30% undervalued according to multiple metrics, including the IMF data and even the informal "Big Mac Index." (20:44) This deliberate policy choice gives Chinese exports massive competitive advantages but comes at the expense of domestic consumers who face higher import costs. James notes that China's 2024 trade surplus could reach $1.2 trillion, potentially matching historic US surpluses from WWII. (17:14) Some Chinese voices are calling for appreciation, but this undervaluation serves China's manufacturing-led growth model and export competitiveness, making it unlikely to change significantly despite rebalancing rhetoric.
Apple's relationship with China illustrates how Western companies become structurally dependent on Chinese manufacturing capabilities. (26:52) Patrick McGee explains that Apple doesn't simply outsource to China—it builds competencies there, investing in machinery, training, and entire ecosystems. The scale is staggering: building up to 230 million iPhones annually with a billion components flowing through the system daily. China's "next door manufacturing" model, where suppliers are within walking distance rather than across ocean borders, creates efficiencies impossible to replicate elsewhere. This dependency isn't just about cost—it's about unique capabilities that took 25 years to develop.
Apple inadvertently created its own competitors through a policy designed to protect itself. (34:50) When Apple instituted the "50% rule"—requiring suppliers to grow as fast with other customers as with Apple—it forced Chinese manufacturers to share Apple's advanced techniques with local brands. Suppliers like Lens Technology, taught by Apple to work with Corning glass and multi-touch technology, then transferred these skills to Huawei, Oppo, Vivo, and Xiaomi. McGee argues this hardware competency transfer, not just software innovation, explains how Chinese brands could challenge global players like Nokia. Apple was never big enough alone to kill Nokia (which had 50% market share vs Apple's peak 20%), but the Chinese ecosystem Apple helped create was.
China's "overcapacity" in manufacturing isn't an economic mistake—it's industrial statecraft. (39:40) By producing more than domestic needs and exporting at cutthroat prices, China systematically deindustrializes other nations. This strategy sacrifices short-term profits for long-term strategic advantage, as Patrick McGee notes: "If you're using this as industrial statecraft, if not war, profit is not the goal." UN projections suggest China will control 45% of global value-added manufacturing by 2030, up from today's one-third share. This gives China enormous leverage over global supply chains and the ability to use economic coercion when needed, as demonstrated in recent rare earth mineral threats against the US.