Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this episode of The Cognitive Revolution, Nathan Labenz speaks with Rune Kvist and Rajiv Dattani, co-founders of the AI Underwriting Company, who are pioneering a comprehensive approach to unlock enterprise AI adoption through certification and insurance. Their core insight is that security and progress are mutually reinforcing - just as safety features like brakes and airbags enable cars to drive safely at high speeds, rigorous standards for AI behavior are critical for society to realize the potential of powerful autonomous AI systems. (00:20) The company combines three key elements: frequently updated technical standards that codify best practices, periodic audits to verify ongoing adherence, and insurance to align incentives and provide financial protection when things go wrong. (00:45)
Rune Kvist is co-founder of the AI Underwriting Company, which aims to unlock enterprise AI adoption by certifying and insuring AI agents. He brings expertise in developing market-based solutions for emerging technology risks and has been instrumental in creating the AIUC1 standard for AI agent certification.
Rajiv Dattani is co-founder of the AI Underwriting Company, working alongside Rune to build comprehensive AI risk management solutions. He focuses on the insurance and auditing aspects of their platform, helping enterprises navigate AI deployment with confidence through third-party verification and financial protection.
The fundamental insight driving the AI Underwriting Company is that better security enables faster deployment, not slower adoption. (09:38) As Rune explains using the race car analogy, drivers wear helmets and seatbelts specifically so they can go faster around corners. Similarly, the better companies can steer and secure their AI systems, the faster they can deploy them and lean into agentic capabilities. This challenges the false dichotomy between "doomers" and "technological optimists" by showing they can actually be aligned in wanting robust AI safety measures.
Today's insurance policies create significant uncertainty for enterprises because AI risks aren't explicitly addressed, leaving companies unsure whether AI-induced incidents would be covered. (16:59) Rajiv notes that while existing policies may cover similar types of harms (like data breaches), when those harms are caused by AI systems, the coverage becomes unclear. This mirrors what happened with cyber insurance in the early 2000s, where it took years of litigation to clarify coverage. Companies are essentially self-insuring AI risks without realizing it, and insurers are taking on risks they haven't priced appropriately.
One of the most innovative aspects of their approach is using AI evaluations and red teaming to generate synthetic loss data for insurance pricing. (21:56) Since historical data for AI incidents is limited and moves too quickly to be useful, systematic red teaming can simulate thousands of potential failure scenarios. Insurers can then estimate what real-world losses would look like from these synthetic incidents, enabling them to price policies even without extensive historical claims data. This creates a clear parametric pricing model where payouts can be pre-agreed based on specific AI behaviors.
The AIUC1 standard, developed through consultation with over 500 enterprise stakeholders, creates a unified framework covering data privacy, security, safety, reliability, accountability, and societal risks. (30:18) Rather than prescribing specific solutions, the standard focuses on disclosure and verification, allowing enterprises with different risk tolerances to make informed decisions. The framework addresses practical concerns like data leakage, hallucinations, bias, and prompt injections while also considering broader societal impacts like enabling cyber attacks at scale.
Unlike credit rating agencies that faced perverse incentives during the 2008 financial crisis, the AI Underwriting Company aligns incentives through insurance skin in the game. (63:56) As a managing general agent, their compensation is directly tied to underwriting results - they earn less when there are large losses and benefit when their risk assessments prove accurate. This financial alignment, combined with quarterly auditing requirements and continuous stakeholder input, creates sustainable incentives for maintaining rigorous standards rather than competing on laxness.