Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
This episode features economist Tyler Cowen discussing the transformative potential of stablecoins and their implications for global finance. (00:28) Cowen explains how the Trump administration has passed legislation to legalize and regulate stablecoins - digital representations of dollars backed 100% by reserves. The conversation explores how these digital currencies could revolutionize international transactions by bypassing traditional banking regulations, while also examining the risks to established financial institutions. (42:59) The discussion extends beyond finance to cover AI's rapid advancement, the competition for AI talent, and broader economic challenges including tariffs, debt, and America's shifting role in global leadership.
Tyler Cowen is a renowned economist and professor at George Mason University, best known for co-founding the influential Marginal Revolution blog over 23 years ago. He has written for major publications including the New York Times for 10 years and Bloomberg for 8 years, and currently writes for The Free Press. Time Magazine recently named him one of the 100 most influential people in AI, recognizing his significant impact on public discourse about artificial intelligence and economics.
The Trump administration's legislation makes stablecoins - digital representations of dollars with 100% backing - legally mainstream in the US financial system. (00:34) Unlike traditional wire transfers, stablecoins can be programmed with instructions and bypass many regulatory hurdles that make international transactions cumbersome. This allows global actors to use US dollars without "Uncle Sam nosing in their business," as Cowen puts it. (05:00) The implications are massive: countries with unstable currencies can access dollar-denominated transactions more easily, while avoiding traditional banking regulations. However, this creates risks for traditional banks, which are already shrinking from over 50% of the financial system to about 20%, as funds potentially drain to non-bank crypto institutions.
As AI systems become more sophisticated, they will need to trade with each other, creating demand for digital currencies that can operate without human bank account setups. (12:01) Cowen predicts that crypto, particularly stablecoins, will become "the money of the AIs" in an autonomous financial system run by artificial intelligence rather than humans. While initially small, this could eventually represent "a few percentage of GDP" as AI agents conduct increasingly complex transactions independently. This represents a fundamental shift toward machine-to-machine commerce that bypasses traditional financial infrastructure entirely.
The most significant AI advances come from remarkably small teams - DeepSeek was built by approximately 150 people, while OpenAI's core GPT-4 team consisted of about a dozen individuals. (115:02) This reality has created unprecedented compensation packages, with rumors of offers approaching $1 billion for key AI researchers. The scarcity of talent capable of these breakthroughs, combined with valuations like OpenAI's expected $500 billion round, means that paying hundreds of millions for the right person can be economically rational. This concentration of capability in tiny teams represents a fundamental shift from traditional large-scale industrial production.
The United States faces a critical disadvantage in AI development due to regulatory complexity at federal, state, and local levels. (101:05) While countries like UAE and China can build necessary power infrastructure in 4 years, the US often requires 8-10 years for similar projects due to environmental reviews, permits, and multiple agencies. Cowen warns that if the world's smartest AI entities are developed outside America due to these delays, it could fundamentally undermine US global leadership. The solution requires coordination across 50 states and multiple government levels, making it a particularly challenging problem to solve quickly.
The European Union's self-image as a regulatory body - "America creates, China builds, and we regulate" - represents a fundamental strategic mistake. (121:08) The EU AI Act and excessive regulation are driving brain drain as entrepreneurs flee to London and Silicon Valley. Cowen notes that European founders constantly seek his help obtaining US O-1 visas, not because they don't love their countries, but because "they can't do business there." This regulatory overreach, combined with the EU's expansion to 27 diverse members requiring unanimity on key decisions, has created a dysfunctional system that stifles innovation while claiming to protect European values.