Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
This podcast features a conversation with five young founders in San Francisco who are building hardware companies focused on solving real-world problems. The founders discuss why they chose San Francisco as their base, their missions to tackle challenges in defense, ocean exploration, terraforming, cooking technology, and storytelling. (02:49) They emphasize San Francisco's historical role as an innovation capital and express optimism about a "return to form" for Silicon Valley, moving away from pure software focus toward physical world applications.
Co-founder of Ulysses, which builds autonomous underwater vehicles for nature restoration, commercial offshore survey and defense applications. Originally from Ireland, he moved his company from Ireland to San Francisco to tap into the city's frontier spirit and talent pool.
Co-founder and CEO of Aurelia Systems, a laser weapon systems company. He operates between San Francisco and Detroit, combining Bay Area R&D talent with Midwest manufacturing capabilities. Previously worked in directed energy weapon systems development for major defense contractors.
Founder of Story Company, focused on creating science fiction films inspired by real engineering stories. A California native who grew up an hour north of San Francisco, he recently released his first sci-fi film "Planet" and aims to provide narrative support for deep tech companies.
Founder and CEO of Impulse Labs, which builds high-performance stoves and is reinventing the electrical grid by integrating battery storage into appliances. Previously worked in AR/VR at companies like Google Glass and Oculus before pivoting to hardware.
CEO of Terra Nova, developing terraforming robots to lift land out of flood zones. A Bay Area native from Centerfell, he was motivated to solve local flooding problems and represents the new generation of founders tackling climate adaptation through engineering.
The founders consistently emphasized that the complexity of hardware companies is actually their competitive advantage. (23:04) As Will O'Brien noted, "the fact that they're difficult companies to build is exactly why they're good companies to build." This difficulty creates natural moats - it's easier to recruit top talent for challenging problems, easier to raise significant funding for massive problems, and the potential rewards are correspondingly large. The complexity acts as a barrier to entry that prevents commoditization.
The group argued that the largest companies by market cap are those that interact with the physical world, not pure software plays. (22:28) They emphasized that truly realizing an abundant future requires "interfacing with the real world" and "manipulating the physical realm into the future that we want." This represents a fundamental shift from the software-focused mentality that dominated Silicon Valley for the past two decades toward companies that touch atoms, not just bits.
Despite concerns about the city's direction, the founders believe San Francisco retains its essential character as a frontier city. (09:49) Will O'Brien traced this spirit from the Gold Rush through the hippie movement to modern tech innovation, noting that "San Francisco very much exemplified the idea of a frontier city" built by people "pursuing westward for a transcendent reason." This historical continuity provides both inspiration and practical advantages for ambitious builders.
Unlike previous generations of tech founders, this cohort is actively engaging with policy and regulatory challenges. (62:42) Sam noted that many hardware founders now share the same lobbyists and frequently visit Washington DC, representing a more politically literate generation that understands how to "get things done at a political level." This engagement is crucial for overcoming regulatory barriers that have hindered hardware development.
The founders emphasized that building physical manufacturing businesses creates far more value than traditional charity or financial philanthropy. (68:56) Michael argued that "planting a facility that employs 2,000 people" has massive downstream effects - raising wages, paying taxes, and supporting thousands more through secondary and tertiary economic impacts. This represents a more sustainable and impactful form of wealth deployment than traditional giving.