Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
This episode of Profg Markets explores Oracle's massive earnings beat and historic $455 billion revenue backlog, driven by a $300 billion compute deal with OpenAI. Ed Elson and guest Gil Luria examine Oracle's position as the "fourth horseman" in AI infrastructure alongside AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. (02:33) The discussion reveals Oracle's projected 77% cloud revenue growth and their unique advantage of not competing directly with AI companies as LLM developers. However, questions arise about OpenAI's creditworthiness and ability to fulfill such massive financial commitments. The episode also covers Apple's lackluster product launch and a federal court ruling blocking Trump's attempt to fire Fed governor Lisa Cook.
Ed Elson is the host of Profg Markets, delivering daily market analysis and business insights. He provides thoughtful commentary on major market movements and corporate developments with a focus on actionable intelligence for investors and business professionals.
Gil Luria serves as Head of Technology Research at DA Davidson, bringing extensive expertise in analyzing technology companies and market trends. His research focuses on cloud computing, AI infrastructure, and the financial sustainability of emerging tech business models.
Scott Galloway is a renowned professor of marketing, bestselling author, and business strategist known for his sharp analysis of technology companies and market dynamics. He's particularly recognized for his critical examination of big tech's strategies and their impact on innovation versus financial engineering.
Oracle has emerged as the preferred cloud partner for AI startups because it's the only major cloud provider that doesn't develop competing LLMs. (03:37) While AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud all create their own AI models that compete with startups, Oracle remains neutral. This positioning has resulted in massive contract wins, including the $300 billion OpenAI deal. For professionals, this demonstrates the power of strategic differentiation - sometimes the biggest opportunity comes from what you choose NOT to do. By avoiding direct competition with potential customers, Oracle created a unique market position that traditional competitors couldn't replicate.
Gil Luria's analysis reveals a crucial insight about Oracle's historic contract: having a signed agreement doesn't guarantee revenue realization. (09:20) OpenAI, despite its success, remains a non-profit with negative gross margins and ongoing fundraising challenges. The company must secure hundreds of billions in debt financing to fulfill its Oracle obligations while also meeting commitments to Microsoft, CoreWeave, and others. This teaches us that in high-stakes business deals, financial capability matters as much as contractual agreements. Always assess counterparty risk, especially when deals seem too good to be true.
Apple's recent product launch revealed minimal innovation beyond incremental improvements and cosmetic changes. (20:03) Scott Galloway points out that Apple has become an "operator" focused on financial engineering through stock buybacks rather than a "builder" investing in breakthrough products. The company has repurchased $700-800 billion in shares - enough to buy major pharmaceutical companies. This shift from innovation investment to financial engineering often signals a company's transition from growth to maturity, even when still valued at growth multiples. For professionals, this highlights the importance of continuous innovation investment over short-term financial optimization.
Apple's limited discussion of AI strategy during their product launch likely reflects legal caution following Google's antitrust ruling. (28:13) Scott Galloway suggests Apple's AI strategy involves licensing deals with companies like Anthropic and OpenAI, similar to their $25 billion annual payment to Google for search default status. However, announcing such deals publicly could trigger antitrust scrutiny. This demonstrates how regulatory environments increasingly influence not just business strategy, but even how companies communicate their plans. Smart professionals must factor legal and regulatory risks into both strategy development and public communications.
The federal court ruling blocking Trump's attempt to fire Fed governor Lisa Cook establishes important precedent for institutional independence. (33:40) Judge Cobb ruled that "for cause" dismissal requires more than policy disagreements and cannot be based on pre-appointment conduct. The decision specifically cited the Federal Reserve's unique role requiring insulation from political pressure. This case illustrates how institutional design and legal frameworks can protect critical functions from political interference, providing stability that markets and professionals rely upon for long-term planning.