Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this episode of Prof G Markets, Scott Galloway and Ed Elson dive deep into the hidden costs of America's AI revolution, examining how the massive energy demands of data centers are driving up electricity costs for consumers by as much as 267% in some areas. (07:07) The discussion reveals a critical infrastructure challenge: OpenAI's ambitious plans to build 250 gigawatts of computing capacity would require the equivalent of 250 nuclear power plants and cost $12.5 trillion to power. (12:12)
• The main theme centers on the collision between AI ambitions and energy reality, highlighting how consumers may ultimately bear the financial burden of powering the AI economy while tech companies reap the profits.
Scott Galloway is a clinical professor of marketing at NYU Stern School of Business, serial entrepreneur, and bestselling author. He's the founder of multiple companies including Red Envelope and L2, and is known for his sharp analysis of big tech and business strategy.
Ed Elson serves as the co-host and researcher for Prof G Markets. He brings analytical depth to market discussions and helps drive the show's data-driven approach to understanding business and economic trends.
The AI boom faces a fundamental bottleneck that most investors are ignoring: power supply. (11:33) While billions flow into data center construction, there's insufficient investment in the energy infrastructure needed to power them. Construction plans for multibillion-dollar data centers keep getting delayed because the waiting list to connect to power sources stretches 5-7 years. This mismatch between AI demand and energy supply creates a classic economic problem where costs will inevitably skyrocket, forcing consumers to subsidize tech companies' AI ambitions through higher electricity bills.
Scott predicts a massive wealth transfer from American households to AI shareholders through increased electricity costs and government subsidies. (16:51) Areas near major data centers have already seen electricity costs rise up to 267% in five years. The government will likely step in with infrastructure investments that effectively transfer taxpayer money to support AI operations, while middle-class families see their energy bills double or triple. This represents regulatory capture where politically connected tech companies socialize their costs while privatizing their profits.
A growing NIMBY movement against data centers has emerged, with $63 billion worth of projects blocked by local communities in recent months. (19:21) Residents in Ohio, Texas, and Indiana have successfully opposed data center construction because these facilities offer minimal job creation (Apple's $1 billion North Carolina data center created fewer than 100 permanent jobs) while dramatically increasing energy costs. Once built, data centers operate like giant robots requiring minimal human oversight, providing little economic benefit to local communities while consuming massive amounts of their energy resources.
Despite public statements about protecting children, tech companies consistently choose profits over child welfare when making product decisions. (34:58) Sam Altman's recent decision to allow "erotica" (pornography) on ChatGPT after initially restricting it demonstrates this pattern. Meta's repeated child safety announcements have proven largely ineffective, with research showing their protections against self-harm, bullying, and sexual content remain weak. The collision of profitable teen engagement (platforms earned $11 billion from users under 18 in 2022) with rising adolescent depression rates (up 60% since social media went mobile) reveals how shareholder value has been directly linked to teen mental health decline.
The availability of AI-powered romantic and sexual relationships poses an existential threat to young men's personal development and society's future. (43:00) Scott argues that sexual desire traditionally motivates young men to develop crucial life skills: physical fitness, social confidence, resilience to rejection, humor, and the ability to form genuine human connections. When AI provides frictionless, perfectly tailored synthetic relationships that always validate and never challenge, young men lose the motivation to develop these essential capabilities. This could create a generation unable to navigate real relationships, corporate environments, or life's inherent difficulties, potentially quadrupling the number of young people who are neither employed, enrolled in education, nor in training.