Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this fascinating conversation, legendary filmmaker Ken Burns joins the show to discuss his latest documentary on the American Revolution and the art of historical storytelling. Burns challenges our sanitized understanding of America's founding, revealing it as a brutal, messy, and contingent struggle rather than the "gauzy, sunlit, noble" narrative we often tell ourselves. (06:20) The documentary explores the revolution not just as a war against Britain, but as a complex civil war involving loyalists, enslaved people, Native Americans, and a deeply divided colonial population. Burns emphasizes how George Washington's leadership was crucial to keeping the thirteen disparate colonies together, despite his tactical mistakes and moral contradictions including slave ownership. (32:58)
Derek Thompson is the host of Plain English and a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he writes about economics, technology, and culture. He is known for his ability to break down complex topics and make them accessible to a broad audience.
Ken Burns is an award-winning filmmaker whose documentary films and television series on American history include The Civil War (1990), Baseball (1994), Jazz (2001), and Country Music (2019). He has spent over three decades creating acclaimed documentaries that bring American history to life through compelling narrative storytelling and meticulous historical research.
Ken Burns emphasizes that the American Revolution was simultaneously a revolutionary war, a civil war, and a world war. (07:03) The thirteen colonies were deeply divided, with many Americans remaining loyal to Britain throughout the conflict. The revolution also involved Native American nations, enslaved and free Black people, and competing European powers fighting for control of North America. This complexity challenges the simplified narrative of united colonists fighting for freedom against British tyranny. Understanding this multi-faceted nature helps us appreciate how precarious and unlikely American independence actually was.
Burns describes Washington as tactically flawed but inspirationally powerful, making critical mistakes at Long Island and Brandywine that nearly cost the revolution. (30:30) However, Washington's physical presence, moral authority, and ability to inspire loyalty kept the fragile coalition together through the darkest moments. Burns notes that Washington was "maybe the richest man in America" who chose to live in a tent for six and a half years, demonstrating a commitment that inspired others to continue fighting. (35:48) His willingness to give up power after victory was equally crucial to establishing American democratic traditions.
Burns advocates for being an "umpire calling balls and strikes" when telling historical stories, resisting both sanitized patriotic narratives and unforgiving revisionist interpretations. (43:08) He emphasizes that human nature contains no binaries - people are complex combinations of virtue and vice. This approach allows for acknowledging both America's inspiring ideals and its moral contradictions, like founding fathers who owned slaves while declaring all men equal. The goal is presenting historical complexity honestly rather than serving contemporary political agendas.
Burns highlights how Thomas Jefferson's use of "all men are created equal" in the Declaration of Independence created an expanding definition of equality that would eventually challenge its own limitations. (19:23) As scholar Yuval Levin notes in the documentary, "once you say the word all, it's all over" - the word becomes "the truck that drives through the doors and smashes down the limited version." Even though the founders meant only white, property-owning men, the universal language they chose provided the moral framework that would later be used to extend rights to enslaved people, women, and others.
Burns describes his key skill as being able to represent the curious but ignorant audience member in the editing room, constantly asking "How do I know this?" and "What assumption are we making?" (45:00) This requires setting aside his extensive knowledge to see the work fresh, ensuring that stories remain accessible and engaging. He emphasizes that the process is subtractive rather than additive - removing unnecessary elements and focusing on what serves the narrative. This approach helps create documentaries that work for both experts and newcomers to the subject.