Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this episode of Odd Lots, hosts Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway sit down with economist Tyler Cowen to explore the surprising reality that despite AI's impressive capabilities, its economic impact has been slower than many anticipated. (03:28) Cowen explains that while AI technology is already mind-blowing and can perform many tasks better than average people, the transformative effects are delayed because legacy organizations are primarily using AI as add-ons to existing workflows rather than building new business models around the technology. (13:55) He predicts that true economic disruption will require completely new organizations built from the ground up with AI integration, which will take 20 or more years to fully transform the economy. (07:21) The conversation covers everything from programming and finance as early adopters to the future of various industries, touching on topics like productivity, culture, blogging, and the intersection of human creativity with artificial intelligence.
Tyler Cowen is an economics professor at George Mason University and co-author of the renowned economics blog Marginal Revolution, which he has been writing daily for over 22 years. (30:23) He is also the host of the popular "Conversations with Tyler" podcast and is widely recognized as one of the preferred economists among tech industry leaders and AI researchers. Cowen is known for his expertise at the intersection of economics and technology, his long-standing presence in the blogging world, and his appreciation for diverse cultural experiences, particularly ethnic cuisine in the DC-Northern Virginia-Maryland area.
The most significant insight from Cowen is that current AI usage primarily consists of add-ons to existing work routines - people use AI to write memos, proofread columns, or fact-check content. (06:56) While these marginal gains are helpful, they won't create major economic impact. True transformation requires completely new organizations built around AI from the ground up, similar to how Toyota's superior methods couldn't be effectively adopted by General Motors in the 1970s, or how traditional media struggled with internet disruption. (07:46) This metabolization process into new organizational forms will take decades, explaining why we haven't seen the expected economic revolution yet.
Cowen identifies programming as the industry experiencing the most immediate AI revolution, with programmers claiming that up to 80% of their work is now done by AI. (08:41) He attributes this to programming's characteristics: low fixed costs, competitive sector dynamics, and immediate feedback mechanisms. Similarly, quantitative finance, which already had algorithmic foundations, is rapidly becoming more AI-equipped. These sectors demonstrate that industries with compatible structures and workflows can absorb AI technology more quickly than others.
Legal and medical professions face significant adoption barriers due to privacy concerns about sending sensitive queries to external AI services. (10:22) Law firms are particularly cautious about fiduciary responsibility when using services that send data to San Francisco-based AI companies. Cowen suggests this will change when firms can control their own AI models locally, which he estimates is only a few years away. (13:29) He also notes that AI queries are subject to subpoena, unlike privileged conversations with lawyers or doctors, creating additional hesitation in adoption.
Contrary to Silicon Valley fears about mass unemployment, Cowen aligns with mainstream economic thinking that AI will ultimately create new employment opportunities. (17:50) He predicts growth in energy sector jobs, elderly care, and biomedical testing as AI enables more medical innovations that require human implementation and oversight. (18:02) However, he warns that upper-middle-class professionals who previously had "automatic tickets" to prestigious careers may face the most disruption, while poor people and the very wealthy will fare better in the transition.
Despite AI's impressive capabilities, Cowen believes people will continue preferring human-created content and interactions because of the inherent value of human-to-human connection. (31:01) He expects AI will capture perhaps 10-20% of creative sectors like music, but listeners will still want that human touch - the feeling of being a fan of Taylor Swift or connecting with human writers. This suggests that while AI will augment creative industries, it won't completely replace human creators who offer authentic personal connection and presence.