Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this episode of No Priors, Harvey co-founder and president Gabe Pereyra joins Sarah Guo and Elad Gil to discuss how Harvey has scaled from zero to nearly 1,000 customers including Walmart, PwC, and other Fortune 500 giants in just over three years. (00:20) The conversation explores Harvey's evolution from an individual lawyer productivity tool to a comprehensive platform that transforms how entire law firms operate and collaborate with their clients. Pereyra shares insights on deploying agentic AI in legal workflows, the strategic decision to enable rather than compete with law firms, and how AI will reshape legal training and business models. (01:51)
Co-founder and President of Harvey, Pereyra previously worked as an AI researcher at DeepMind focusing on reinforcement learning and at Meta on large language models. He also has experience in investment banking and private equity, giving him unique insights into both the technical capabilities of AI and the complex workflows of professional services.
Co-host of No Priors podcast and prominent AI investor who led Harvey's Series B funding round. She has extensive experience investing in AI companies and understanding enterprise software adoption patterns.
Co-host of No Priors podcast and serial entrepreneur and investor known for his work with high-growth technology companies. He was one of Harvey's early seed investors and brings deep Silicon Valley experience to the conversation.
Harvey's evolution reveals a critical insight about AI implementation in professional services. (01:51) While the company started as a tool to make individual lawyers more productive, Pereyra explains that the real value lies in transforming how entire teams and organizations work together. This shift from personal productivity to systemic change represents a fundamental difference in how AI creates value at scale. Rather than just making one person 20% more efficient, the focus becomes enabling entirely new organizational structures and capabilities that weren't possible before.
One of Harvey's most powerful frameworks is thinking of AI agents as sophisticated associates. (07:36) Pereyra describes how associates typically receive high-level strategy from partners and then execute research, drafting, and analysis tasks. This natural delegation model translates perfectly to agentic AI systems that can handle similar workflows - researching case law, drafting documents, and providing structured analysis back to senior lawyers. This mental model helps law firms understand how to deploy AI effectively while maintaining their existing hierarchical structures.
Harvey's decision to enable law firms rather than compete with them demonstrates sophisticated strategic thinking about market dynamics. (25:25) Pereyra explains that building both a law firm and a software company simultaneously would require excellence in two completely different domains. More importantly, the bigger opportunity lies in making every law firm more profitable and AI-enabled rather than capturing a small slice of the market through direct competition. This approach allows Harvey to scale across the entire legal industry without the conflicts and limitations of being a single practice.
Legal work provides a natural reinforcement learning environment where AI agents can learn and improve over time. (08:05) Pereyra draws parallels between coding environments where agents get feedback through unit tests and legal environments where client matters serve as the testing ground. Partners provide feedback on work quality, creating training data that helps models understand not just what's technically correct, but what's strategically sound. This creates a continuous improvement loop where AI systems become more valuable as they gain experience with specific types of legal work.
Harvey's impact on legal training represents one of the industry's most significant long-term challenges and opportunities. (09:43) Traditionally, law firms rely on large numbers of associates to identify future partners, but as AI handles more routine work, firms may hire fewer associates while still needing to develop the next generation of leaders. However, Pereyra suggests that AI can actually improve legal education by making learning more interactive and accessible, similar to how programming education has improved with AI assistance. The key will be redesigning training programs to leverage AI as a teaching tool rather than seeing it as a replacement for human development.