Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this special episode of Against the Rules' Big Short companion series, Michael Lewis sits down with Bloomberg Opinion columnist Matt Levine to examine how Wall Street has transformed since the 2008 financial crisis. (04:00) The conversation explores the status revolution that occurred on Wall Street, where traditional investment banks like Goldman Sachs lost their prestige to hedge funds and private equity firms due to increased regulation and risk limitations. (10:00) They also discuss Bitcoin as a direct response to the crisis, the emergence of "narrow banking" through stablecoins, and whether the financial system has actually become safer or simply moved risk elsewhere. (23:45)
Michael Lewis is the bestselling author of The Big Short and numerous other financial narratives including Liar's Poker and Flash Boys. He previously worked as an investment banker at Salomon Brothers and has become one of the most influential financial journalists of his generation, known for his ability to make complex Wall Street machinations accessible to mainstream audiences.
Matt Levine is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion and hosts the newsletter and podcast Money Stuff. He worked as an investment banker at Goldman Sachs during the 2008 financial crisis, experiencing the turmoil firsthand from inside one of Wall Street's most prestigious firms. (06:32) His unique perspective combines practical Wall Street experience with sharp analytical insights about modern finance.
The most significant change since 2008 has been the migration of high-risk, high-reward activities away from traditional investment banks to hedge funds, private equity firms, and alternative asset managers. (10:00) Matt Levine explains that regulatory changes, particularly the prohibition of proprietary trading at banks, forced these institutions to become more conservative. This created a status revolution where places like Citadel, Apollo, and KKR became the new prestige destinations for ambitious finance professionals, while Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley lost their appeal. The result is a more stable banking system, but one where the most talented risk-takers work elsewhere, potentially creating new concentrations of systemic risk in less regulated institutions.
Despite all the changes since 2008, Levine emphasizes that the fundamental pattern of financial crises hasn't changed: institutions borrowing short-term to fund what they believe are safe, long-term assets. (24:40) This applies whether it's banks using deposits to buy mortgage-backed securities or hedge funds leveraging treasury bonds 100 times over. The danger isn't necessarily in the riskiness of the assets themselves, but in the mismatch between short-term, runnable funding and longer-term investments. When confidence disappears, these institutions can go from profitable to bankrupt in hours, regardless of their actual asset quality.
Bitcoin represents a direct response to the 2008 crisis, with its pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto explicitly referencing the financial crisis and seeking to create a system without fractional reserve banking or powerful intermediaries. (23:45) However, Levine notes the irony that the cryptocurrency world quickly recreated the same leveraged, risky structures that caused the original crisis, culminating in events like the FTX collapse. The crypto winter of 2022-2023 essentially replayed 2008 in miniature, but without government backstops, proving that the same fundamental dynamics apply regardless of the underlying technology.
While Levine doesn't predict an imminent crisis, he identifies large multi-strategy hedge funds as the institutions most likely to be at the center of future systemic problems. (28:09) These firms now perform many functions that banks used to handle, are highly leveraged, and have become central to market functioning. Unlike banks, they're much less regulated and have attracted the best risk management talent from traditional institutions. Their apparent safety and steady profits make them particularly dangerous because they could experience rapid confidence loss, similar to what happened to investment banks in 2008.
The emergence of stablecoins represents a potential existential threat to traditional banking by offering a "narrow banking" model where deposits are backed by safe assets like Treasury bills rather than risky loans. (30:23) This trend, driven partly by post-crisis mistrust of banks, could lead to a financial system where deposit-taking and lending are completely separated. While this might be safer, it threatens the traditional banking model and could force a complete restructuring of how monetary policy is transmitted through the economy.