Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
This AI mini-summit panel explores the massive capital requirements for funding the global AI revolution, with experts predicting growth from $1 billion to $3 billion deployed daily by 2030. (03:15) The discussion reveals how traditional venture capital structures are being rewritten as AI companies require unprecedented amounts of funding, with some startups reaching $10 billion valuations in just two years. (09:48)
General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz (A16z), leading AI and infrastructure investments. He sits on the board of Mistral and backed Anthropic, playing a key role in frontier AI and open source infrastructure investments.
CEO of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing (HKEX) since March 2024, bringing over 30 years of global capital markets, legal, and business transformation experience. Under her leadership, Hong Kong became the number one global IPO market in 2024.
Managing Partner of LINK Exponential Ventures with 23 startups under his belt and a 44% IRR track record. He manages over $1 billion AUM from a base on the MIT and Harvard campus, focusing on early-stage AI companies emerging from top universities.
The panel emphasizes that conventional funding structures cannot meet AI's massive capital requirements. (05:21) Anjney explains that "all the rules are being rewritten about how you fund growth because we just need all the capital we can get." This has led to strategic investors like NVIDIA, Amazon, and Google directly investing alongside traditional VCs. Dave notes that US venture capital provides only $200 billion annually, but AI needs five times more capital, forcing companies to seek corporate money and strategic partnerships to fill the void.
Despite unlimited demand for AI capabilities, energy supply has become the critical constraint limiting expansion. (12:23) Anjney highlights that "the fundamental constraint is energy" and that compute providers are "trying to outbid each other to buy literally just energy supply." This creates a paradox where companies have access to advanced chips but lack sufficient power density in legacy data centers to run them effectively. The energy bottleneck affects everything from data center deployment timelines to the geographic distribution of AI infrastructure.
David reveals that MIT and Harvard AI startups have achieved a "near 100%" success rate, attributing this to abundant use cases relative to the available talent pool. (17:53) He explains, "if you have the talent, you'd have to be crazy to go after a bad use case right now" because AI can be applied to so many verticals. This mirrors the early internet era where the technology's flexibility enabled almost any reasonable application to succeed. Companies are particularly drawn to vertical use cases as they're less capital-intensive than building entire data centers.
The concentration of AI wealth among private investors poses significant societal risks. (22:09) Anjney warns that "the vast majority of wealth being created by Frontier AI is locked up inside of private capital" and questions what happens "when the rest of the public goes, well, where's my piece of the future?" The panel discusses how AI leaders are already facing death threats and civil unrest concerns. The solution involves connecting public institutions like sovereign funds and pension funds to AI investment opportunities rather than leaving wealth creation to family offices and high-net-worth individuals.
The panel warns about speculative investments in AI-adjacent areas that could trigger a market correction similar to the dot-com crash. (26:52) Dave cautions that capital is flowing into peripheral investments like fusion energy and robotics with the AI label, stating these are "very capital intensive" and "not the obvious win of AI." Bonnie expresses concern about retail investors becoming "the last one at the party before the whole thing collapses" due to inflated valuations established by opaque price discovery mechanisms among a small group of investors.