Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
Evolutionary biologist Macken Murphy joins the podcast to explore the fascinating world of attraction science and modern dating dynamics. (00:00) The conversation delves deep into women's penis size preferences, revealing surprising findings about the disconnect between stated preferences and actual experiences. (00:33) Murphy discusses how the ideal preferences women express often exceed what they've encountered in reality, highlighting the complexity of human mate selection.
The discussion expands to cover the controversial Ollie Muirs body transformation debate, examining why women and men had dramatically different reactions to his lean physique. (14:41) Murphy explains this through the lens of "formidability" - women's evolved preference for partners who appear capable of protection rather than simply aesthetically optimal.
Host of Modern Wisdom podcast, one of the fastest-growing podcasts globally. Former club promoter turned influential content creator who has interviewed leading thinkers across psychology, business, and science. Known for his insightful conversations about human optimization and societal trends.
Evolutionary biologist at the University of Melbourne, writer, and podcaster behind Species. Murphy specializes in human mating behavior and attraction science, frequently creating viral content on TikTok that explains complex evolutionary psychology concepts to mainstream audiences. His research focuses on how modern environments interact with evolved mating preferences.
Research using 3D models revealed that women's ideal penis size preferences (6.3 inches length, 4.8-5 inches circumference) represent approximately the 95th percentile - about as rare as a 6'2" man. (03:00) Remarkably, most women in the study had never actually encountered their stated ideal size, suggesting they were expressing preferences for something they'd never experienced. This highlights how ideal mate preferences can be disconnected from practical dating decisions and real-world availability.
The Ollie Muirs transformation controversy revealed a fundamental difference in how men and women evaluate male physiques. Women preferred his "before" photo not because they dislike fitness, but because they unconsciously assess which version would "win in a fight." (22:35) Murphy explains this stems from evolved psychology where women needed partners capable of protecting them and their children. This formidable appearance often correlates with slightly higher body fat percentages (13-14%) rather than extremely lean physiques.
Contrary to traditional assumptions, modern men prioritize physical attractiveness over a woman's sexual history. (47:27) Studies show men consistently choose more attractive women even when they're perceived as more promiscuous. The optimal "body count" for both men and women peaks at 1-3 previous partners, with virginity being as unattractive as having significantly above-average experience. This shift reflects how contraception and modern social contexts have changed the strategic value of sexual history.
Individuals with more than five previous sexual partners show double the infidelity rate compared to those with fewer than five partners. (66:42) This pattern holds true for both men and women, contradicting the belief that only women face consequences for sexual history. The correlation exists because past behavior predicts future behavior - those who engage in casual sex are more likely to continue seeking sexual variety, even within committed relationships.
Despite popular narratives about wealthy men choosing waitresses over executives, data shows the opposite trend. (79:56) Higher-status men consistently pair with higher-status women, richer men marry richer women, and more educated men select more educated partners. The fantasy of successful men dating significantly below their socioeconomic level doesn't match real-world patterns. Elite individuals tend to value intellectual compatibility and shared life experiences that come with similar achievement levels.