Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this episode, Luca Ferrari, co-founder and CEO of Bending Spoons, reveals the unique business model behind his company: 25% private equity and 75% technology company. (05:20) Ferrari describes how Bending Spoons acquires digital companies like Evernote, Meetup, Vimeo, and AOL to own and operate them forever, completely rebuilding their products, infrastructure, monetization, and teams. (06:00)
• Main themes: The conversation explores Bending Spoons' acquisition-driven growth strategy, their talent-first culture, and Ferrari's vision of building a defining European technology company
Luca Ferrari is the co-founder and CEO of Bending Spoons, a unique acquisition-driven technology company founded in 2013. Ferrari built the company from €40,000 in initial capital after his previous startup failed, developing it into a billion-euro revenue business that has acquired major digital properties including Evernote, Meetup, Vimeo, and AOL. He previously worked at McKinsey to fund his co-founders while they built their first startup, demonstrating his commitment to entrepreneurship from the early days.
Patrick O'Shaughnessy is the CEO of PositiveSum and host of the "Invest Like the Best" podcast. He conducts in-depth conversations with leading investors, entrepreneurs, and business builders, exploring strategies for better investing both time and money.
Ferrari emphasizes that structural advantages emerge when integrating different businesses under one roof. (19:19) Beyond simple cost synergies like better vendor negotiations, Bending Spoons can fluidly move R&D and marketing resources across businesses to attack fleeting opportunities. Ferrari explains that most companies are "years behind" optimal staffing because hiring and training are slow, but opportunities are fast-moving. By pooling flexible talent, they can quickly capitalize on R&D windows and withdraw resources when opportunities fade, creating both offensive and defensive efficiency advantages.
The company's extreme selectivity - hiring 250 people from 800,000 applications (1 in 3,200) - creates a self-reinforcing talent advantage. (23:30) Ferrari argues that while standalone companies like Evernote attract "somewhat average talent," Bending Spoons' growing, diverse model appeals to exceptional people who want variety and rapid skill development. This allows them to attract stronger talent and invest heavily in AI-powered prediction systems to better select within that talent pool - advantages that standalone companies simply cannot achieve.
After observing dozens of startup teams, Ferrari concluded that going from zero-to-one is largely luck-dependent, with little correlation between talent/effort and success. (17:05) However, functional skills like software engineering, design, and marketing improve predictably with effort and discipline. This insight led to Bending Spoons' acquisition model: buy businesses where someone else got lucky or succeeded at zero-to-one, then apply superior functional execution to scale them. This strategy bets on controllable skill development rather than random market timing.
Ferrari learned that seeking consensus while trying to achieve something exceptional will doom you to failure. (26:10) Despite naturally enjoying consensus and struggling with friction, he discovered that having clear intellectual conviction and accepting disagreement - even "pissing some people off" - is a superpower. He argues management teams worry too much about team members disagreeing with or criticizing them, when they should be uncompromising if they believe they have the right path forward after listening to input with intellectual honesty.
Contrary to typical startup practice, Bending Spoons pays everyone fixed salaries with no variable pay, stock grants, or KPI-based bonuses. (60:00) Ferrari believes this approach maximizes alignment by hiring high-integrity people with professional pride, then treating them with utmost respect. He argues that financial incentives are costly to administer, inevitably create perverse incentives due to imperfect design, and make relationships more transactional, hindering genuine problem-solving collaboration focused on collective success.