Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this episode of Decoder, guest host Hayden Field interviews Kanjoon Q, CEO of AI startup mView, about the biggest AI stories of the week. (02:30) The discussion covers OpenAI's Dev Day announcements including ChatGPT apps and agent tools, the explosive launch of the Sora video generation app flooding social media with AI-generated content, and the growing arms race between AI-powered job screening systems and applicants trying to game them. (15:34) Throughout the conversation, Q emphasizes a central theme: we're at a critical crossroads where we must decide whether AI becomes another walled garden platform like social media or empowers individual users with decentralized control over their digital environments. (05:17)
• Main Theme: The battle between centralized AI platforms versus decentralized, user-controlled AI systems and the broader implications for power dynamics in technologySenior AI reporter at The Verge and guest host for this episode of Decoder. Field has been covering AI for six years and focuses on the shifting power dynamics within the AI industry and how these systems affect society.
CEO of AI startup mView and a seasoned tech founder and investor with unique perspectives on the AI industry. Q has previously built an ML recruiting startup and is deeply involved in discussions about AI ethics, decentralization, and user empowerment in technology.
According to Q, we're currently at a pivotal moment that will determine whether AI becomes another walled garden platform ecosystem or empowers individual users. (05:14) She draws parallels to the 1960s when people expected everyone to time-share supercomputers, but personal computing emerged instead through innovations at Xerox PARC. The key insight is that just like the mouse and GUI democratized computing, we need similar breakthrough innovations for AI to avoid repeating the mistakes of social media platforms. This means creating systems where users control their AI tools rather than being controlled by them.
When algorithms make decisions about human lives without recourse mechanisms, we inevitably see gaming behaviors emerge. (29:05) Q explains this through the lens of AI job screening, where applicants hide ChatGPT instructions in resumes while companies deploy increasingly sophisticated detection methods. The fundamental problem isn't the gaming itself but the lack of transparency and user control. She advocates for "explainable and controllable" AI systems where affected individuals can understand and modify how decisions are made, rather than engaging in endless technological warfare.
Q introduces the concept of "common source" - a middle ground between open source and closed source that would allow users to modify software for their specific needs while still allowing creators to profit. (33:55) She envisions a future where professionals like doctors could use AI agents to customize their electronic medical record systems in real-time, reducing burnout and improving efficiency. This requires reshaping technical, payment, and economic infrastructure to make software more adaptable to individual user needs rather than forcing users to adapt to rigid systems.
Q highlights the abnormality of needing to "detox" from our digital devices, comparing it to never needing to detox from furniture. (06:51) This reveals how our devices are filled with systems designed by others with misaligned incentives focused on attention capture rather than user wellbeing. As AI becomes more powerful, these misaligned incentives become more dangerous. The solution involves creating technology that serves users' actual needs rather than optimizing for engagement and profit extraction.
Since AI replicates intelligence and intelligence is a source of power, the key question becomes who gets access to this power. (44:18) Q argues that AI will give users the ability to scale themselves, automate tasks, process information, and take actions - all literal sources of power. The current trend of AI interviews and screening systems exacerbates existing power imbalances by allowing companies to scale their processes while forcing individuals to remain unscaled. The opportunity lies in democratizing access to AI tools so individuals can create their own agents and level the playing field.