Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
Prashanth Chandrasekar, CEO of Stack Overflow, returns to Decoder three years after his last appearance – just one month before ChatGPT launched. This conversation reveals how the generative AI boom created an existential crisis for Stack Overflow, the go-to question and answer platform for developers. (02:42) When ChatGPT emerged, Stack Overflow faced immediate disruption: AI could answer coding questions instantly, while their community was being flooded with low-quality AI-generated responses. Chandrasekar describes calling a "Code Red" situation, reallocating 10% of the company's resources to develop a strategic response. (07:07) Three years later, Stack Overflow has transformed from primarily a community-driven platform into an enterprise SaaS business, selling AI-powered solutions to companies and licensing their data to major AI labs including OpenAI and Google.
• Main Themes: The conversation explores the fundamental tension between AI adoption and human expertise, the challenge of monetizing community-generated content in the AI era, and how established tech companies navigate existential threats.
CEO of Stack Overflow since 2019, leading the company's transformation from an engineering-led organization focused on their public platform into a product-led company. Previously worked at Rackspace in cloud services, where he gained experience responding to disruptive threats like Amazon Web Services. He studied under Clayton Christensen at business school, learning frameworks for managing disruptive innovation that he later applied during the ChatGPT crisis.
Editor-in-Chief of The Verge and host of Decoder. Covers technology, business strategy, and the intersection of policy and innovation, with particular focus on how major tech shifts impact companies and communities.
When ChatGPT launched, Chandrasekar immediately recognized the existential threat to Stack Overflow's core value proposition. (07:07) He carved out 10% of the company (about 40 people) specifically to develop a strategic response, setting a hard deadline of six months. This approach draws from Clayton Christensen's "Innovator's Dilemma" framework, which suggests creating autonomous teams with different incentives to respond to disruptive threats. The key insight is that during true disruption, incremental responses aren't enough – you need dedicated resources and clear timelines to develop meaningful solutions.
Rather than choosing between AI and human expertise, Stack Overflow adopted both approaches. (21:57) They maintained their ban on AI-generated answers to preserve trust and quality, while simultaneously launching AI-powered features like AI Assist that leverage their human-curated knowledge base. This strategy recognizes that users want the speed of AI interfaces but still need the reliability of human-verified information. Companies facing AI disruption should consider how to integrate new technologies without abandoning their core value propositions.
Stack Overflow pivoted to enterprise SaaS and data licensing while their public platform was still experiencing declines. (19:18) Their enterprise business now serves 25,000 companies, while data licensing partnerships with major AI labs provide recurring revenue. Chandrasekar explains that waiting for traffic to recover would have been too risky – the internet's advertising model was fundamentally changing. The lesson is to build new revenue streams during disruption rather than hoping existing models will recover.
Stack Overflow's AI Assist feature uses a RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) approach that first searches their corpus of 80-90 million human-curated Q&As before falling back to general LLMs. (60:50) This addresses the trust gap where 80% of users want to use AI but only 29% actually trust it. By providing attribution and grounding AI responses in verified human knowledge, companies can bridge the enthusiasm-trust divide that characterizes current AI adoption.
Chandrasekar predicts that 2026 will be the "year of rationalization" as CFOs demand ROI from AI investments. (66:48) While 2025 has been characterized by open experimentation with AI tools, companies will soon face pressure to prove productivity gains and reduce tool redundancy. Organizations should focus on AI solutions that provide measurable value and clear differentiation rather than adopting every available tool. This suggests a coming consolidation in the AI tools market.