Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts delivered a forceful critique of the Trump administration's assault on free speech and democracy in this episode of Decoder. (02:42) The senator compared Trump to George Orwell's "Big Brother" from 1984, arguing that the president has weaponized federal agencies like the FCC to control thought and silence criticism. (06:44) The conversation covered the concerning actions of FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, who has threatened broadcasters like CBS and ABC over content critical of Trump, the unclear status of the TikTok ban that Congress passed but the administration refuses to enforce, and the broader attack on First Amendment protections across media platforms.
Ed Markey is the senior United States Senator from Massachusetts, having served in the Senate since winning a special election in 2013. He previously served in the House of Representatives for 37 years and is known as a leading voice on technology policy, telecommunications regulation, and climate change. Markey has been particularly active in AI regulation and children's online safety, introducing landmark legislation in these areas.
Neil Patel is the Editor-in-Chief of The Verge and host of the Decoder podcast. He leads coverage of technology, policy, and their intersection at one of the most influential tech media outlets, conducting in-depth interviews with leaders across government, business, and technology.
Senator Markey emphasized that Trump has transformed the Federal Communications Commission into what he called the "Federal Censorship Commission" under Chairman Brendan Carr. (07:14) The FCC is threatening broadcasters with license revocation and fines for content that criticizes the president, including comedy shows like Jimmy Kimmel and Seth Meyers. This represents an unprecedented use of regulatory power to chill speech, with media companies like CBS choosing to "bend the knee" and pay fines rather than fight in court, despite having strong First Amendment protections that would likely prevail.
Despite having strong legal grounds to contest government overreach, major media companies are choosing capitulation over confrontation. (10:18) Senator Markey pointed out that companies like CBS and other networks are "willing to bend a knee" and accept illegal government pressure rather than contest it in court. This creates a dangerous precedent where wealthy media companies essentially pay tribute to avoid regulatory harassment, undermining the First Amendment's protection of free speech for all Americans.
Congress passed a law requiring TikTok's parent company ByteDance to sell its assets or cease operations in the United States, which the Supreme Court upheld as constitutional. However, the Trump administration is simply choosing not to enforce this law while secretly negotiating deals with Oracle and other companies. (13:43) Senator Markey noted that Trump is "in complete violation of the law to begin with" but faces no accountability from Republicans in Congress, demonstrating how legal authority can be wielded selectively for political purposes.
The Trump administration, led by figures like AI czar David Sacks, is pushing to preempt state-level AI regulations and privacy laws. (39:47) This effort repeatedly appears in Congressional bills despite being voted down 99-1 in the Senate. Senator Markey warned that this represents an attempt by the "most extreme elements in the AI industry" to override state protections on AI's impact on workers, civil rights, children, and the environment, concentrating power in the hands of wealthy tech interests.
Despite partisan divisions, Senator Markey noted unexpected bipartisan coalitions forming against tech industry demands. (50:17) He cited working with Marjorie Taylor Greene to remove AI preemption language from legislation, saying "Hell was freezing over" when they found common ground. This suggests that populist concerns about tech power may transcend traditional party lines, creating opportunities for meaningful regulation if lawmakers have the courage to stand up to wealthy interests.