Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this engaging episode of Conversations with Tyler, renowned legal scholar Cass Sunstein discusses his latest works on liberalism, AI, and manipulation while exploring the challenges facing liberal democracy today. (01:19) The conversation delves deep into whether liberalism is self-undermining or simply vulnerable to illiberal forces, with Sunstein arguing that liberalism "doesn't create the conditions for its own self perpetuation" but isn't inherently self-destructive. (01:44) Tyler Cowen and Sunstein examine complex topics ranging from immigration policy and the rise of populism to AI's First Amendment implications and Bob Dylan's embodiment of liberal freedom. (1:13:50)
Tyler Cowen is an economist at George Mason University and co-founder of the Marginal Revolution blog. He hosts the popular Conversations with Tyler podcast, where he engages leading thinkers across disciplines in wide-ranging intellectual discussions.
Cass Sunstein is one of the most widely cited legal scholars of all time and among the most prolific writers working today. (00:34) This year alone he has five books published, including "On Liberalism: In Defense of Freedom," "Imperfect Oracle" on AI's strengths and limits, and works on manipulation and climate justice. He has served in government roles including at the Department of Homeland Security under the Biden administration, focusing on regulatory policy and resilience.
Sunstein identifies that liberalism's primary vulnerability isn't self-destruction but rather its inability to create conditions for self-perpetuation. (01:44) The challenge comes from "something illiberal in the human heart" - an attraction to order, control, and sometimes cruelty that can override liberal commitments. (02:29) This insight suggests that maintaining liberal democracy requires constant vigilance and active cultivation of liberal norms, rather than assuming they will naturally persist.
The discussion reveals the tension between liberal ideals of human dignity and the practical necessity of border enforcement. Sunstein advocates for "lawful pathways" that expand legal immigration while maintaining effective deterrence of illegal entry. (12:03) His experience at the southern border, where he encountered Russian asylum seekers, reinforced his belief that immigration policy should be grounded in recognition of "moral equivalence of everyone on the planet" while still being "appropriately aggressive" in enforcement. (11:01)
Drawing parallels between animal welfare and immigration enforcement, Sunstein argues that innovation can make difficult moral trade-offs less painful. (17:04) Better technology at borders - walls, sensors, and personnel - can reduce the need for "brutality" in immigration enforcement, just as meat alternatives reduce animal suffering. This technological optimism suggests that apparent conflicts between humanitarian concerns and policy enforcement may be temporary problems solvable through innovation.
While AI systems themselves don't have free speech rights, Sunstein argues that government restrictions on AI communication violate the First Amendment rights of human users and creators. (45:15) People have rights to receive information, and content-based restrictions on AI interactions would be presumptively invalid. This framework suggests that AI regulation must be carefully crafted to avoid infringing on fundamental human rights while addressing legitimate concerns about AI-generated content.
Sunstein proposes establishing a legal right not to be manipulated, similar to how privacy rights developed in the early 20th century. (55:24) This would address situations where people are tricked into decisions without using their reflective capacities, particularly in commercial contexts with hidden terms or deceptive practices. Such a right would focus on "egregious cases where people are losing money or time without getting adequate clarity on what's happening to them," providing legal recourse beyond current fraud protections. (56:13)