Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
Dave Ricks, CEO of Eli Lilly, the world's most valuable pharmaceutical company, sits down to discuss the complex business of drug development and the future of medicine. The conversation covers the true origin story of GLP-1 drugs (discovered in Gila monster saliva), their potential beyond weight loss to treat addiction and inflammation, and how "self-pay" has become the primary way new patients access Zepbound. (05:07) Ricks explains how they make critical R&D decisions that can cost billions, with the average drug costing $3.5-4 billion to develop and more than 60% of that being spent in the final phase three trials. (08:25)
Dave Ricks is the CEO of Eli Lilly, the world's most valuable pharmaceutical company worth $700 billion. He joined Lilly in 1996 in business development and M&A, working his way up through various roles including running operations in China and leading the US business before becoming CEO. Under his leadership, Lilly has become the market leader in GLP-1 diabetes and weight loss drugs while pioneering direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical sales through Lilly Direct.
Ricks reveals that Lilly makes only "three or four important decisions a year and they're all science." (04:44) The key is implementing a rigorous decision process that acts like "bumpers on a bowling alley" to prevent bad decisions, while still allowing for judgment and taste within that framework. They have a rule to never decide in one meeting, allowing time for reflection and debate. This approach combines systematic analysis (the "Billy Bean" moneyball approach) with qualitative judgment (the "Rick Rubin" taste-based approach), ensuring both analytical rigor and creative insight inform major capital allocation decisions.
Lilly spends almost 25% of sales on R&D ($14 billion this year), rivaling entire nations' medical research budgets. (08:02) However, Ricks emphasizes that their competitive advantage comes not just from spending more, but from having "probably the highest return on investment in R&D in the industry" through process optimization. They've reduced their drug development time from the industry average of 10 years to less than 7 years at Lilly. The key insight: while picking winners matters, the systematic approach to running R&D operations can be equally valuable for generating superior returns.
Lilly Direct, their direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical platform, now generates billions in annual revenue and represents the largest prescription platform online by revenue. (1:42:57) What started as a response to insulin pricing issues became the "killer app" for direct patient experience with GLP-1s, where the diagnosis is simple (everyone knows if they're overweight) and patients can easily track if the drug is working. This bypasses the traditional healthcare system's complexity and "this is not a bill" pricing opacity, allowing patients to simply pay $500/month and get their problem solved.
Rather than competing in existing markets, Lilly strategically targets "illnesses but not medicines" - conditions without current treatment options. (1:51:01) This blue ocean strategy, similar to NVIDIA's approach to "$0 markets," allows them to create entirely new therapeutic categories. The GLP-1 story exemplifies this: they've been working on the mechanism since 2006, grinding on the theme through iterative improvements rather than seeking breakthrough moments. This long-term commitment to platform development, combined with the discipline to pursue big bets on zero-value markets, has created their current competitive moat.
As the 11th CEO of Lilly in 150 years (with only one external hire), Ricks exemplifies the power of internal succession planning. (2:00:41) He was "put in jobs I had no business being in" four or five times throughout his career, with the company betting on his ability to learn rather than existing expertise. This approach creates leaders who understand both the technical domain and the "unspoken operating system called culture," making them more effective in new roles. The key is balancing internal development with selective external hires who can bring fresh perspectives while fitting the culture.