Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
Senator Joe Manchin discusses his experiences in a 50-50 Senate and the intense pressure he faced from his own party over the Build Back Better bill. The conversation covers his clashes with the Biden administration, including death threats and organized protests at his houseboat. (04:12) Manchin shares his perspective on Obama's elusiveness as a president compared to Trump's direct engagement style. He advocates for term limits, the importance of maintaining the filibuster, and explores the potential for breaking the two-party duopoly through electoral reform. (52:17)
Former U.S. Senator from West Virginia and author of "Dead Center: In Defense of Common Sense." Manchin served as West Virginia's governor before entering the Senate, where he became known for his centrist positions and willingness to oppose his own party on major legislation. He played a pivotal role in a 50-50 Senate, ultimately blocking the Build Back Better Act and defending the filibuster against pressure from Democratic leadership.
Host and entrepreneur who co-hosts the All In podcast, known for conducting in-depth interviews with prominent political and business figures.
Venture capitalist and co-host of the All In podcast, former Facebook executive who brings a business perspective to political and economic discussions.
Manchin's defense of the filibuster despite intense party pressure demonstrates how preserving democratic institutions often requires individuals to stand against their own political interests. (10:05) His experience shows that the Senate's deliberative nature depends on members who prioritize institutional integrity over partisan advantage. Despite facing death threats and organized protests, Manchin maintained his position that eliminating the filibuster would fundamentally damage American democracy by removing the cooling mechanism the founders intended.
Drawing from his grandmother's three-rule system for helping people - no drinking, no swearing, and you must work - Manchin argues that work requirements preserve human dignity and prevent dependency. (30:27) He contrasts this with modern entitlement programs that provide benefits without contribution, arguing this creates a psychological shift from "what can I do for my country" to "what can my country do for me." His grandfather's approach of offering work in exchange for money created a natural filtering system that helped people maintain self-respect while receiving assistance.
Manchin's direct comparisons reveal stark differences in presidential engagement styles. He describes Obama as "elusive," Trump as highly engaged and charming in person, and Biden as initially collaborative but ultimately pushed too far left by his staff. (23:59) Trump called Manchin more in two years than Obama did in eight, highlighting how personal engagement affects legislative relationships. This suggests that successful governance requires presidents who actively work with Congress rather than remaining distant from the legislative process.
Manchin argues that closed primaries disenfranchise the largest group of voters - independents - who cannot participate in candidate selection despite being eligible for general elections. (54:49) With only 24 million people participating in primaries but 160 million voting in general elections, he contends that a small fraction controls everyone's choices. He suggests this could be challenged legally under voting rights principles, potentially forcing open primaries that would allow centrist candidates to emerge and break extreme partisan control.
A constituent's insight that "maybe we'd get one good term out of you" with term limits convinced Manchin that limiting congressional service would restore courage and principle to public office. (37:37) He proposes two six-year terms for senators and six two-year terms for representatives, arguing this would eliminate the constant reelection pressure that prevents lawmakers from making tough decisions. This system would transform public service from "fame and fortune" back to genuine service by removing the incentive to prioritize political survival over constitutional duty.