Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
This episode explores the unprecedented scale of AI infrastructure buildout, featuring three industry veterans discussing what they describe as the largest physical infrastructure expansion in modern history. (00:14) The conversation covers the massive demand for compute, power, and networking resources, with experts noting that current demand far exceeds supply across all categories. (04:00)
VP and GM of AI and Infrastructure at Google, where he oversees the development and deployment of Google's TPU systems and large-scale infrastructure. He has been instrumental in Google's ten-year journey building TPUs, now in their seventh generation in production.
President and Chief Product Officer at Cisco, leading the company's transformation into an AI-focused infrastructure provider. Under his leadership, Cisco has developed comprehensive solutions spanning from silicon to applications, including recent innovations in scale-across networking architectures.
Partner at Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), focusing on infrastructure and enterprise technology investments. He moderates this discussion, bringing his venture capital perspective to the conversation about AI infrastructure scaling.
The infrastructure demand for AI is so massive that it will outpace supply capacity for 3-5 years, according to industry leaders. (05:00) Google's seven and eight-year-old TPUs still run at 100% utilization, demonstrating the depth of unmet demand. Companies are being forced to turn away valuable use cases simply due to infrastructure constraints, not because the applications lack merit. This creates a unique situation where organizations literally have money they cannot spend fast enough due to supply chain limitations in power, land, and specialized components.
Data centers are now being built where power is available rather than bringing power to desired locations, fundamentally changing infrastructure planning. (06:54) This shift is driving the need for distributed architectures where multiple data centers act as a single logical unit, potentially separated by hundreds of kilometers. Organizations must now factor power availability as the primary constraint in their infrastructure decisions, leading to more geographically dispersed but logically connected computing resources.
The future belongs to highly specialized processors optimized for specific workloads, with efficiency gains of 10-100x over general-purpose alternatives. (12:12) However, the current development cycle of 2.5 years from concept to production is too slow for the rapidly evolving AI landscape. Companies that can accelerate this specialization cycle while maintaining quality will gain significant competitive advantages, as the power, cost, and space savings from specialized architectures are too substantial to ignore.
Successfully implementing AI tools requires a fundamental cultural shift in how teams approach technology evaluation and adoption. (26:40) Leaders must train their teams to assume AI capabilities will improve dramatically within six months and plan accordingly, rather than dismissing tools based on current limitations. Organizations should establish rapid re-evaluation cycles of 3-4 weeks rather than shelving tools for months, as the pace of AI advancement makes yesterday's limitations today's solved problems.
The most successful AI infrastructure deployments require deep co-design and integration from hardware to software, similar to how Google co-developed systems like Bigtable and Spanner with their underlying hardware. (10:02) Companies must work as unified entities even when they're separate organizations, establishing deep design partnerships that span months before implementation. This level of integration minimizes inefficiencies across the stack and maximizes the utility delivered per watt of power consumed.