Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this compelling conversation between Harry Stebbings and Andreessen Horowitz General Partner Alex Rampell, listeners get an unfiltered look at how venture capital really works today. (02:20) Alex breaks down why venture firms must either go big or stay boutique to succeed, sharing how the "death of the middle" affects asset classes including VC. The discussion covers everything from fund size dynamics and pricing risk to the art of winning deals and building lasting companies. (28:43) Alex reveals his core investment framework of backing founders who can "materialize labor, capital, and customers," while explaining why the best companies have "hostages, not customers." (14:00) They also explore how AI is reshaping software categories, the challenges of extended private markets, and what it takes to build enduring businesses in an era where competitive advantages compress faster than ever.
Alex Rampell is a General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz where he leads their apps fund and has invested in companies like Mercury, Plaid, Opendoor, and Rilla. He's also a serial entrepreneur, having founded companies including TrialPay (acquired by Visa) and previously worked in payments and fintech since 1997, giving him deep domain expertise in financial technology.
Harry Stebbings is the host of The Twenty Minute VC podcast and a prominent figure in the venture capital ecosystem. Starting his career at age 17 by cold-emailing VCs, he's built one of the most influential podcasts in the startup world and has become a respected voice on venture capital trends and startup strategies.
Alex emphasizes the importance of backing founders who can "materialize labor, capital, and customers." (14:46) This means finding entrepreneurs who can attract top talent to follow them for pay cuts, convince investors to fund them across multiple rounds, and secure their first customers even without proven traction. The example of Toast's early days illustrates this perfectly - convincing restaurants to adopt unproven POS software requires extraordinary persuasion skills. This framework helps identify founders who can execute regardless of market conditions.
The best entrepreneurs Alex has encountered, from Stripe's Collison brothers to Robinhood's Vlad, have deeply studied the history of their industries. (16:26) Patrick Collison even met with Dee Hock, Visa's founder, and gave Alex academic textbooks on payment systems. This historical knowledge prevents entrepreneurs from repeating past failures and helps them understand why previous attempts failed. However, Alex warns against knowing too much, as it can create false negatives - he passed on Stripe initially due to his payments expertise.
Alex looks for founders driven by something deeper than financial gain - what he calls "Count of Monte Cristo" motivation. (18:18) This refers to entrepreneurs seeking revenge or redemption, often stemming from childhood experiences or being wronged at previous companies. Dave Duffield starting Workday after PeopleSoft's hostile takeover exemplifies this drive. This motivation becomes crucial when founders face the temptation of large acquisition offers that would normally be life-changing money.
The most defensible businesses create switching costs so high that customers become "hostages." (20:53) Alex explains that while marginally better products can't displace entrenched systems like Workday, new companies will choose the best available option. This creates the "greenfield bingo" opportunity where startups can win by capturing new market creation rather than stealing existing customers. Mercury Bank exemplified this by serving new companies rather than competing directly with SVB for existing clients.
One of Alex's three core investment theses involves backing software that does jobs previously done by people. (49:12) He uses the example of Eve, which helps plaintiff attorneys handle small cases they'd normally reject due to time constraints. These solutions can scale rapidly because they offer immediate ROI - replacing $80,000 annual salaries with $20,000 software costs. However, he warns these companies must eventually build sticky moats, as pure AI wrappers will face intense competition from countless competitors built quickly using modern development tools.