Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this wide-ranging conversation, Trae Stephens, Partner at Founders Fund and Co-founder/Executive Chairman of Anduril, explores the concept of choosing "good quests" in the AI era and beyond. (00:35) Stephens argues that the ease of building uninteresting AI applications is distracting top talent from tackling humanity's most pressing challenges, comparing founders to Dungeons & Dragons characters who should focus their skills on meaningful problems rather than consensus categories with dozens of competitors.
Trae Stephens is a Partner at Founders Fund and Co-founder/Executive Chairman of Anduril, a defense tech company focused on autonomous systems. Previously, he was an early employee at Palantir Technologies for six years, where he led teams in intelligence/defense and international expansion while being integral to product strategy and design. He began his career as a computational linguist building enterprise solutions for Arabic/Persian name matching within the U.S. Intelligence community and worked in Congressman Rob Portman's office and at the Embassy of Afghanistan.
The ease of building AI applications is creating a dangerous distraction for top talent. (00:33) Stephens warns that while it's possible to create a billion-dollar company with one employee using AI, this leads to "whiteboard founding" where entrepreneurs generate dozens of similar ideas using LLM APIs, creating dozens of competitors in consensus categories. The opportunity cost is enormous - our most skilled people should be "fabricating semiconductors or something that's going to move the needle for humanity" rather than getting lost in AI gold rush dynamics. (03:45)
In defense technology, building a superior product doesn't guarantee government adoption. (00:21) Stephens uses the example of a hypothetical perpetual motion machine - even if you built this revolutionary technology, the Department of Defense would likely give Lockheed Martin a $100 billion contract to rebuild it from scratch rather than buy from a non-traditional player. Success requires understanding government procurement processes and developing strategies to navigate them as a newcomer, making business development and regulatory relationships potentially more important than pure product innovation.
The first question Stephens asks founders is about their origin story, which serves as a quick filter for avoiding memetic rivalry. (46:25) Founders should have a compelling reason for starting their specific business beyond "we wanted to found a company and this seemed fastest to market." Companies with incredible stories typically outperform those born from market analysis or whiteboard sessions. This approach helps identify authentic entrepreneurial motivation versus following trends or consensus thinking.
Effective venture investing requires aggressive concentration in top-performing companies rather than spreading capital across many small bets. (40:57) Stephens advocates for 40-50% of a fund concentrated in the top five or six companies from each vintage. This means writing larger initial checks and fighting for pro-rata rights in truly exceptional companies while avoiding the trap of automatically following on in mediocre performers just because other VCs marked them up. The key insight: "If it's not a deal that we would have done absent the initial investment, then you should pass."
The combination of deep operational experience with broad venture capital exposure creates unique advantages. (27:31) Stephens describes how going "a mile deep" at Anduril provides intellectual substance that complements the "six inches of depth across the widest possible breadth" that venture capital typically offers. This depth enables better evaluation of technical feasibility, market dynamics, and founder capabilities, while the breadth maintains curiosity and pattern recognition across sectors. (28:59)