Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this episode of Raging Moderates, Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov dissect Trump's latest economic populism attempts while examining deeper political and social issues. (08:22) The hosts explore Trump's $2,000 tariff rebate checks proposal, his claims that affordability concerns are a "con job," and the mathematical impossibility of funding these promises with current tariff revenue. (38:05) They also discuss California Governor Gavin Newsom's bold stance on the masculinity crisis facing America, warning Democrats they can't afford to ignore rising suicide rates and educational struggles among men and boys. (55:14) The episode concludes with lighter commentary on Texas Democrat James Talarico's OnlyFans following controversy and the emerging "Mar-a-Lago face" plastic surgery trend.
Professor of Marketing at NYU Stern School of Business and serial entrepreneur who founded multiple companies including Section, an AI adoption platform for corporations. Currently on a book tour promoting his work on masculinity and America's crisis facing men and boys, with his insights being referenced by political leaders including Governor Newsom.
Political strategist and commentator who completed a PhD with a focus on political economy. She regularly appears on television news programs and co-hosts Raging Moderates, bringing academic rigor and practical political analysis to contemporary issues affecting American democracy.
Trump's proposal for $2,000 tariff rebate checks demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of economic policy. (11:41) The non-partisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found that these checks would cost $600 billion, while tariff projections only generate around $300 billion in federal revenue. This represents the core problem with populist economic promises: they sound appealing but lack mathematical foundation. The real issue is that tariffs function as a regressive tax on consumers, raising prices on everything from fruits to housing materials, then running this revenue through bureaucratic processes to distribute checks. This creates administrative complexity while essentially taking money from consumers' left pocket to give back through their right pocket, minus government overhead costs.
Governor Newsom's acknowledgment of the masculinity crisis represents a pragmatic approach that Democrats need to embrace. (38:05) The statistics are stark: suicide rates among young men are "off the charts," dropout rates are climbing, and graduation rates show women will soon outnumber men in four-year colleges by two to one. However, the solution isn't about attacking feminism or rolling back women's progress. Instead, it's about creating economic opportunity and mentorship programs that help young men find purpose and pathways to success. Newsom's California executive order focused on unleashing mentors and providing apprenticeship programs, demonstrating how to address masculine identity crisis through practical economic empowerment rather than divisive cultural messaging.
The COVID stimulus programs revealed a crucial lesson about economic policy that applies to current tariff rebate proposals. (24:01) Analysis showed that recipients with over $3,000 in savings didn't spend a cent of their CARES Act payments, meaning 70-85% of the $7 trillion stimulus wasn't actually needed by recipients. This created massive inflation in asset prices like housing, which jumped from $290K to $410K average prices, while mortgage rates increased from 3% to 6%. The result was that average mortgage payments doubled from $1,200 to $2,300, making homeownership impossible for young people while enriching existing homeowners. Any future stimulus or rebate programs must be means-tested to ensure they actually help those in need rather than inflating asset bubbles for the wealthy.
Contrary to popular self-help advice about "loving yourself first," practical relationship building comes through experience, including failed relationships. (40:42) The data shows that men benefit significantly more from relationships than women, with 70% of divorce filings coming from women who often conclude that their male partners are neither effective providers nor contributors to child-rearing. Rather than avoiding relationships until achieving perfect self-awareness, young people need to engage in normal dating and relationship experiences, learning from breakups and heartbreak. These experiences teach patience, help identify personal preferences, and develop emotional intelligence that can't be gained through self-reflection alone. The key is distinguishing between normal relationship failures that provide learning opportunities and genuinely harmful or abusive situations.
The most valuable feedback often triggers defensive reactions because it touches on accurate assessments we don't want to acknowledge. (45:38) This principle applies whether receiving student evaluations as a professor, book reviews as an author, or performance feedback in any professional context. When feedback immediately makes you defensive or angry, it likely contains elements of truth that need examination. Conversely, feedback that feels obviously wrong or mean-spirited typically rolls off easily because it doesn't resonate with internal insecurities or actual shortcomings. The challenge is learning to pause when receiving criticism that stings, resisting the immediate defensive impulse, and honestly evaluating whether the feedback reveals areas for improvement or blind spots in self-perception.