Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this episode of Raging Moderates, Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov dissect the fracturing of the MAGA movement as Trump loses control over his base, right-wing influencers turn on each other, and the 2028 power struggle begins. (03:54) They explore three key fault lines dividing the Republican party: the Epstein files controversy, policy disagreements over tariffs and H1-B visas, and the antisemitic wing's battle over Israel support. The hosts also examine the quiet maneuvering to replace Chuck Schumer as Democratic Senate leader, with Amy Klobuchar emerging as a frontrunner. The episode concludes with Michelle Obama's blunt assessment that America still isn't ready for a female president, sparking debate about the future of Democratic leadership and electability versus competence.
Professor of Marketing at NYU Stern School of Business, entrepreneur, and bestselling author including "Notes on Being a Man." Galloway is a prominent voice in business and politics, known for his sharp analysis of tech companies, market dynamics, and political trends.
Co-host of Fox News' "The Five," the most-watched show in cable news with 3.7 million viewers. Tarlov is a Democratic strategist and political analyst who provides liberal perspective on Fox News programming and appears regularly across major media outlets.
Jessica Tarlov identified what she calls the "three-legged stool" of MAGA breakdown: conspiracy theorists demanding Epstein file releases, policy hawks opposing Trump's tariffs and H1-B visa positions, and the antisemitic wing battling over Israel support. (10:18) This fracturing represents more than typical political disagreements—it signals that even Trump loyalists see him as a lame duck and are positioning for post-2028 influence. The key insight is that when core supporters like Marjorie Taylor Greene directly challenge Trump and gain political capital from it, the movement's unity is genuinely threatened. Smart political operators should recognize that Trump's grip on the party is weakening faster than expected, creating opportunities for alternative Republican voices.
Galloway highlighted how platforms like Meta and X elevate controversial content far beyond its organic reach because inflammatory posts generate more engagement and ad revenue. (22:46) He noted that Tucker Carlson's interview with Nick Fuentes garnered 6 million views—potentially 10 times more than average cable news shows reach in their core demographic. The critical lesson is that we're witnessing "nonorganic monster creation" where algorithms amplify fringe voices like Fuentes well beyond what their ideas would naturally attract. This creates a dangerous feedback loop where extreme positions appear more mainstream than they actually are, influencing everything from congressional staff opinions to voter perceptions.
The hosts wrestled with whether Democrats should prioritize the most competent candidate (like Amy Klobuchar) or the most electable one (like Gavin Newsom) for future races. (31:20) Galloway admitted this keeps him up at night, torn between supporting someone he believes would govern best versus someone more likely to win. This reflects a broader strategic challenge: Michelle Obama's assertion that America isn't ready for a female president forces Democrats to choose between breaking barriers and winning elections. The practical takeaway is that political parties must honestly assess voter biases rather than wishful thinking when making strategic decisions about candidates.
Traditional cable news viewership pales in comparison to podcast and social media influence, with Fox News averaging just 1.4 million viewers daily while individual podcast episodes can reach 6 million. (19:48) This shift means political figures must master different platforms and communication styles to reach voters effectively. The implication is that future political success will depend more on podcast appearances, social media savvy, and direct-to-audience communication than traditional media interviews. Politicians who fail to adapt to this new ecosystem will find themselves increasingly irrelevant, regardless of their policy positions or governing experience.
Both hosts identified Senator Amy Klobuchar as their top choice to replace Chuck Schumer as Senate Democratic leader, praising her Midwest appeal, pragmatic approach, and willingness to fight when necessary. (29:58) Tarlov emphasized that Klobuchar embodies "raging moderate" politics—centrist but combative when needed. Her appeal crosses geographic and ideological lines within the Democratic coalition while avoiding the coastal elite perception that hurt other potential leaders. The strategic insight is that effective leadership in today's polarized environment requires both policy competence and the ability to project strength, making Klobuchar's "Minnesota nice with steel underneath" persona particularly valuable for Democrats' future.