Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
Honorable Emil Michael, Under Secretary of War for Research & Engineering and Chief Technology Officer for the Department of War, joins Sourcery to discuss modern defense technology and the DoW's strategic priorities. Drawing from his experience scaling Uber into a global technology company, he explains how the same disruptive principles apply to modernizing America's defense capabilities. (02:36) Michael outlines the DoW's six critical technology areas—Applied AI, Scaled Hypersonics, Scaled Directed Energy, Biomanufacturing, Contested Logistics, and Battlefield Information Dominance—while dispelling misconceptions about defense technology companies like Palantir, SpaceX, and Anduril.
Emil Michael serves as Under Secretary of War for Research & Engineering and Chief Technology Officer for the Department of War, overseeing organizations including DARPA, the Missile Defense Agency, and the Defense Innovation Unit. Previously, he was a key executive at Uber, helping scale the company into a global technology platform, and completed a White House fellowship working under Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
Molly O'Shea is a host at Sourcery, conducting interviews with technology and defense leaders. She focuses on exploring the intersection of venture capital, innovation, and strategic technology developments.
Michael draws direct parallels between his experience at Uber competing with Lyft and the current technological competition with China. (03:03) Just as Uber disrupted traditional transportation, the DoW must disrupt traditional defense contracting to stay ahead of adversaries. The same principles of fresh perspective, questioning established processes, and rapid innovation that work in Silicon Valley are essential for modernizing America's defense capabilities. This approach involves coming in with "no biases" and asking fundamental questions about what's working versus what needs to change, rather than accepting bureaucratic status quo.
The DoW reduced their critical technology areas from 14 to just 6 because "if something's critical for ten years, that means you're not making much progress on it." (10:22) Michael explains that when organizations try to prioritize everything, they effectively prioritize nothing. By concentrating resources on six key areas—Applied AI, Scaled Hypersonics, Scaled Directed Energy, Biomanufacturing, Contested Logistics, and Battlefield Information Dominance—teams can wake up every day knowing exactly what they're working toward. This focus principle applies to any professional context where scattered priorities prevent meaningful progress.
The Russia-Ukraine conflict taught critical lessons about modern warfare, particularly how quickly it became "a robot war, a drone on drone war" with front lines consisting of "robots against robots." (17:17) Rather than relying on theoretical frameworks, the DoW adapts strategies based on actual battlefield innovations happening in real-time. This principle of learning from live implementation rather than hypothetical scenarios applies broadly—whether you're developing software, managing teams, or launching products, real-world feedback trumps theoretical planning every time.
Michael emphasizes creating an ecosystem where "investors keep investing in these companies and companies keep succeeding" by removing barriers rather than creating them. (19:23) In his first 45 days, he completed three critical mineral deals to reduce dependency on China, demonstrating how strategic partnerships can rapidly solve complex challenges. The key is identifying mutual benefits and streamlining processes to enable success rather than adding bureaucratic obstacles. This approach works whether you're building vendor relationships, internal partnerships, or cross-functional collaborations.
Michael notes that "the farther you are removed from the problems that a conflict can cause, the easier it is to disdain what it costs to keep the country safe." (25:24) This observation applies beyond defense—professionals who stay closest to customer problems, market realities, or operational challenges make better decisions than those operating from abstract theories. Whether you're in product development, strategy, or leadership, maintaining direct contact with the real-world impact of your decisions leads to more effective solutions and better judgment calls.