Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this episode of Prof G Markets, host Ed Elson discusses the dramatic market selloff following President Trump's escalating threats to acquire Greenland. (02:32) The S&P plunged 2% in its worst session since October, Bitcoin dropped below $90,000, and the VIX hit its highest level since November as investors fled to safe haven assets like gold. (03:09) Justin Wolfers, professor at the University of Michigan, explains why markets are taking these threats seriously this time, warning of potential trade wars with the EU and the collapse of NATO if Trump follows through. The episode also covers Netflix's mixed earnings results and their all-cash bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, plus Trump's various affordability proposals that appear largely unserious given the continued implementation of tariffs.
Ed Elson is the host of Prof G Markets and author of the "Simply Put" newsletter. He was previously recognized in the "30 Under 30" list and brings a unique perspective to financial markets and business analysis through his engaging interview style and critical market commentary.
Justin Wolfers is a professor of public policy and economics at the University of Michigan. He is a recognized expert in economic policy and has conducted significant research on market reactions to geopolitical events, including a notable study on the stock market effects of the Iraq invasion that found stocks were valued 15% lower during the conflict.
Rohan Goswami is a business reporter at Semafor who covers major corporate deals and streaming industry developments. He provides in-depth analysis of M&A activities and has been closely following the Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition battle between Netflix and Paramount.
Justin Wolfers explains that markets serve as crucial filters for determining which of Trump's frequent threats are actually serious. (05:06) While Trump makes "hair-brained ideas" daily and typically backs down nine out of ten times, markets help traders assess the probability of follow-through. The 2% market drop suggests investors are pricing in roughly a 10% chance that Trump is serious about Greenland, but the consequences of that scenario would be catastrophic - including potential trade wars with the EU (22% of American exports) and the possible end of NATO.
Wolfers raises a provocative point about the psychological profiles of those who seek ultimate power. (13:34) He suggests that people with profound personality disorders are more likely to believe they're uniquely qualified to run the world's largest economy and military. This insight has profound implications for institutional design - rather than just corruption-proofing governments post-Nixon, we may need to "mental health proof" our political systems with stronger checks and balances that function even when charismatic but potentially unstable leaders gain power.
Netflix's pursuit of Warner Bros. Discovery represents a dramatic departure from their successful strategy of building content organically since House of Cards. (22:33) Rohan Goswami notes that Netflix has been "great builders" but "unproven buyers," having never done a major acquisition. The market's 40% decline in Netflix shares since rumors began reflects investor uncertainty about execution risk, especially given Warner Bros.' history of failed mergers dating back to the AOL Time Warner disaster.
Trump's slate of affordability plans - including 10% credit card interest caps and institutional home buying bans - are largely performative rather than practical. (34:41) Wall Street's muted reaction to these announcements signals they're not taken seriously as viable policy. Meanwhile, tariffs continue to drive inflation, with Americans absorbing 96% of tariff costs according to the Keel Institute. The contradiction between stated affordability goals and maintaining inflationary tariff policies undermines the credibility of any cost-reduction initiatives.
The Netflix-Warner Bros. merger agreement was secured through aggressive negotiation tactics, with Ted Sarandos essentially issuing a "pencils down" ultimatum. (27:30) His lawyers told Warner Bros. to respond by that night or Netflix would walk away entirely. This high-pressure tactic worked because Warner Bros. couldn't risk losing Netflix, demonstrating how decisive leadership and willingness to walk away can be powerful negotiation tools in major corporate deals.