How Superintelligent AI Could Upend Work and Politics
Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
Podcast Summary
In this thought-provoking episode of Plain English, Derek Thompson explores the economic implications of artificial general intelligence (AGI) with economist Anton Korinek from the University of Virginia. (02:51) The conversation delves into what happens if AGI predictions come true within the next few years, examining both the potential benefits and unprecedented challenges this technology could bring to the global economy. Thompson begins by drawing parallels between the current AI boom and historical speculative bubbles, while Korinek argues that despite the hype, AGI could be fundamentally more transformative than any previous invention. (09:02) The discussion covers scenarios ranging from "quiet AGI" to "loud AGI," the potential for mass unemployment, and the political challenges that could emerge from rapid technological displacement of human workers.
- Main Theme: Exploring the macroeconomic implications of artificial general intelligence, including potential job displacement, price changes, and the need for policy interventions to prevent an "AGI Great Depression."
Speakers
Derek Thompson
Derek Thompson is a staff writer at The Atlantic and host of the Plain English podcast. He covers economics, technology, and culture, with a focus on making complex topics accessible to general audiences.
Anton Korinek
Anton Korinek is an economist at the University of Virginia and one of the leading experts on the economics of transformative AI. Before focusing on artificial intelligence, he studied financial crises and speculative booms, bringing a unique combination of macroeconomic skepticism and technological optimism to his research on superintelligence and its economic implications.
Key Takeaways
AGI Could Trigger Unprecedented Economic Disruption
Korinek argues that while current AI development resembles historical speculative bubbles, AGI represents something fundamentally different. (09:03) Unlike previous technologies that automated specific tasks, AGI by definition would be capable of performing "virtually all valuable economic work." This could lead to rapid displacement across multiple industries simultaneously, potentially causing unemployment levels comparable to or exceeding the Great Depression. The key difference is that this disruption could affect high-skilled cognitive work first, reversing centuries of technological progress that typically eliminated manual labor while creating demand for intellectual work.
The "Quiet vs. Loud AGI" Distinction Matters for Economic Impact
Thompson introduces a crucial framework distinguishing between "quiet AGI" (where the technology exists but takes time to implement) and "loud AGI" (where immediate, dramatic breakthroughs capture public attention). (19:35) Korinek favors a middle path where AGI capabilities are rapidly deployed for productive purposes like curing diseases and solving scientific problems, rather than remaining underutilized. This distinction is critical because the speed of implementation determines whether society has time to adapt economically and politically to these changes, or faces sudden mass disruption.
Baumol's Cost Disease Will Create Strange Price Dynamics
In an AGI-dominated economy, services requiring human physical presence will become extremely expensive due to Baumol's cost disease. (34:49) As cognitive work becomes nearly free through automation, jobs involving physical interaction—from healthcare to food service—will see dramatic price increases. This creates a paradoxical economy where a software program might cost pennies to run but hiring a home health aide could become prohibitively expensive. Korinek notes this reverses the historical trend where physical work became cheaper and cognitive work became more valuable.
Political Backlash Could Halt AGI Development
The most significant threat to AGI development may be political rather than technical. (50:17) If rapid technological deployment causes mass unemployment, incumbent political parties will face electoral punishment, and opposition parties will likely campaign on anti-technology platforms promising to "shut down the machines." Korinek emphasizes this represents a fundamental challenge to democratic governance, as the competitive forces driving automation may be too powerful for gradual adaptation, creating conditions for a backlash that could prevent society from realizing AGI's potential benefits in medicine, science, and other fields.
A "No American Left Behind" Program Will Be Essential
To prevent economic and political chaos, Korinek argues for implementing comprehensive support systems before mass displacement occurs. (55:06) The challenge isn't just economic but psychological—people don't want to be seen as "losers" requiring government support. Any successful transition to an AGI economy must preserve human dignity and agency while ensuring that technological progress benefits everyone, not just technology owners. This requires proactive policy intervention rather than reactive crisis management, as the speed of potential change may outpace traditional economic adjustment mechanisms.
Statistics & Facts
- According to a METER study cited by Thompson, the length of tasks that frontier AI models can execute at a 50% success rate is doubling every seven months. (05:18) This suggests that within the next year or two, AI systems could tackle projects requiring several weeks of human work.
- There are currently more radiologists today than in 2015, despite predictions that AI would automate radiology work, and they earn over half a million dollars on average—one of the highest-paid occupations in the US. (38:02)
- Korinek predicts that in a disruptive AGI scenario, unemployment could reach 20% or higher, exceeding Great Depression levels of economic disruption. (48:08)
