Is It Enough? Michael Howell on Money Market Turbulence, Standing Repo Facility, and Why Fed Balance Sheet Expansion Is Inevitable
Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
Podcast Summary
Michael Howell of GL Indexes returns to discuss the Federal Reserve's surprise announcement to end Quantitative Tightening (QT) on December 1st, 2025, and the implications for liquidity and markets. (01:16) The conversation explores how recent repo market strains and funding tensions forced the Fed's hand, with Powell hinting at balance sheet expansion of approximately $20 billion monthly starting in 2026. (02:35) Despite this policy reversal, Howell maintains his cautious outlook, arguing that the measures are insufficient to address underlying liquidity shortages. He explains how the transition from Fed QE to "Treasury QE" through massive bill issuance represents a fundamental shift toward monetizing deficits, potentially reigniting inflation concerns while creating refinancing pressures in an overleveraged financial system.
• **Main Theme:** The Federal Reserve's forced pivot from quantitative tightening to potential balance sheet expansion represents a critical inflection point in global liquidity cycles, but the scale remains inadequate to address systemic funding pressures.Speakers
Michael Howell
Michael Howell is the founder of GL Indexes and author of the Capital Wars Substack, where he tracks global liquidity flows and monetary policy impacts on financial markets. He has decades of experience analyzing cross-border capital flows and has developed proprietary metrics for measuring Federal Reserve liquidity that have proven prescient in predicting market tensions and policy changes.
Jack Farley
Jack Farley is the host of Monetary Matters podcast, focusing on Federal Reserve policy, monetary economics, and financial market analysis. He conducts in-depth interviews with leading economists and market strategists, providing listeners with sophisticated analysis of central banking and liquidity dynamics.
Key Takeaways
The Fed's "Not-QE QE" Represents a Forced Policy Reversal
The Federal Reserve's decision to halt quantitative tightening on December 1st wasn't a strategic choice but a necessity driven by severe repo market strains. (01:48) When SOFR rates spiked 25-30 basis points above normal levels, it signaled dangerous funding shortages in the world's most critical money markets. This forced Powell to abandon the Fed's previous stance of never returning to QE, though they're calling it "liquidity injection" rather than quantitative easing to save face. The key insight is recognizing when central banks are reacting to market stress rather than proactively managing policy - these reactive moves often indicate deeper systemic issues that require monitoring.
Adequate Bank Reserves Require $3.3 Trillion, Not the Fed's $2.7 Trillion Target
Howell's market-based analysis suggests banks need approximately $3.3 trillion in reserves to function properly, significantly higher than the Fed's official target of $2.7 trillion. (42:42) His calculation derives from historical patterns of when repo market tensions emerge, providing a real-world measure of liquidity adequacy. Even with the announced $20 billion monthly balance sheet expansion, reserves will remain below this critical threshold, suggesting continued funding pressures. This teaches professionals to question official targets and develop independent metrics based on market behavior rather than theoretical models.
Modern Financial Markets Are Debt Refinancing Systems, Not Capital Allocation Mechanisms
Three-quarters to four-fifths of all global financial transactions now involve debt refinancing rather than raising new capital for productive investments. (34:39) This fundamental shift means liquidity flows matter more than traditional valuation metrics for understanding market movements. The repo market has become the critical nexus, growing by approximately $1 trillion annually and serving as the marginal financing vehicle for the global economy. Professionals must recognize that modern markets operate more like sophisticated refinancing machines than traditional investment platforms, requiring different analytical approaches.
Treasury Bill Issuance Represents Dangerous Deficit Monetization
The Treasury's strategy of funding deficits through short-term bill issuance rather than longer-term bonds constitutes direct monetization when banks purchase these securities. (12:54) This approach, while seemingly easier in the short term, risks driving broad money supply growth to 8-10% annually - well above levels consistent with 2% inflation targets. (24:43) Stanley Druckenmiller correctly identified this funding pattern as resembling Latin American economies rather than developed markets. The strategy may feel successful initially but historically leads to inflation problems, teaching the importance of sustainable fiscal practices over short-term convenience.
Global Liquidity Cycles Are Approaching a Critical Inflection Point
Despite recent policy accommodation, Howell's analysis suggests the global liquidity cycle is nearing its natural end after approximately 65 months - the historical average cycle length. (33:19) The ratio of advanced economy debt to available liquidity is approaching dangerous levels above 2:1, where refinancing crises typically emerge. (36:18) China's recent reduction in liquidity injections adds another concerning dimension to global flows. This teaches professionals to think in cycles rather than linear trends, preparing for major shifts even when current conditions appear stable.
Statistics & Facts
- The Federal Reserve will inject approximately $20 billion monthly in liquidity starting in 2026, totaling about $250 billion annually. (02:35) However, Howell estimates markets need $400-500 billion, making this injection roughly half of what's required.
- The Treasury General Account has reached nearly $1 trillion, representing a massive drain of liquidity from financial markets. (05:03) This historically high level reflects the impact of debt ceiling resolution and government shutdown dynamics on money market flows.
- Modern financial markets see 75-80% of all transactions involving debt refinancing rather than new capital formation. (34:39) Additionally, 77% of global lending is now collateral-backed according to World Bank data, fundamentally changing how financial markets operate.
