Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this episode of Monetary Matters, economist Jay Shambaugh—former Under Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs—discusses U.S.-China economic relations, trade policy, and the current administration's approach to tariffs and immigration. (00:50) Shambaugh explains how China's fundamental economic imbalances, driven by excessive savings and state-directed overcapacity, create global distortions that affect manufacturing worldwide. He critiques the current administration's chaotic tariff implementation, arguing it damages U.S. credibility while failing to address China's structural issues effectively. (07:42) The conversation covers the economic impacts of immigration flows, Federal Reserve challenges with rising unemployment amid persistent inflation, and the broader implications of America's shifting role in global economic leadership.
Jay Shambaugh is an economist at George Washington University and former Under Secretary of the U.S. Treasury for International Affairs under the Biden administration. He previously served at the Council of Economic Advisors at the White House and worked at Dartmouth College. Shambaugh has extensive expertise in international economics, trade policy, and macroeconomic analysis, with particular focus on U.S.-China economic relations and global financial stability.
China's economy operates with fundamental imbalances—extremely high savings rates that exceed even their massive investment levels, creating persistent current account surpluses. (00:50) This isn't just a trade issue; it's a macroeconomic reality where China produces more than it consumes, forcing that excess production into global markets. As China has grown to become the world's second-largest economy and dominant manufacturer, these imbalances now significantly impact everyone else. The challenge intensifies when China's state-driven system directs resources toward specific industries at specific times, creating "overcapacity" that distorts global production and makes it impossible for market-based firms to compete profitably.
The Biden administration's approach focused on building multilateral pressure through G7 statements, coordinated tariffs with allies, and consistent messaging that the world wouldn't accept China's economic distortions. (06:38) Shambaugh emphasizes this strategy was showing success—Canada mirrored U.S. tariffs, Europe imposed EV tariffs, and countries worldwide began implementing anti-dumping measures. However, the current administration's unilateral approach has fractured this coalition, making China feel they can weather a trade war with just the U.S. while maintaining relationships with other nations.
Shambaugh illustrates how the current administration's "strategic ambiguity" on tariffs creates massive uncertainty that prevents businesses from making crucial investment decisions. (38:07) His Christmas tree vendor example—where the owner couldn't order mugs because tariff uncertainty made cost planning impossible—demonstrates how small businesses suffer. Larger firms face similar paralysis: when you don't know if tariffs will be 20% or 50%, the option value of waiting increases dramatically, leading to reduced investment and hiring across the economy.
The reversal from high immigration under Biden to negative flows under Trump represents a major economic shock that's making Federal Reserve policy decisions more difficult. (52:03) Shambaugh explains that high immigration helped cool inflation by increasing labor supply, while current deportation efforts are reducing labor supply even as unemployment rises. This creates unusual labor market dynamics where typical job growth expectations no longer apply, and even legal immigrants may avoid responding honestly to government surveys out of fear.
While tariffs don't cause immediate recessions, they create lasting damage by reducing efficiency and slowing growth over time. (25:37) Shambaugh cites research showing that when trade costs increase (like during Suez Canal closures), countries most affected see measurably slower growth. The current tariff structure forces firms to shift supply chains away from optimal sources, reduces productivity growth in leading export firms (which typically pay higher wages), and creates a regressive tax system that disproportionately burdens lower-income households.