Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
This episode features Lyn Alden of Lyn Alden Investment Strategy discussing the critical divide in the U.S. economy between AI-driven growth and broader economic weakness. (01:02) Alden reveals that without AI capital expenditure, U.S. GDP growth would be just 0.1%, compared to the current 4.1%, highlighting how artificial intelligence investments are masking underlying economic fragility. The conversation explores AI's transformative potential while examining the sustainability of massive capital expenditures, Bitcoin's evolving role as a maturing asset class, and the Federal Reserve's liquidity management challenges.
Lyn Alden is the founder of Lyn Alden Investment Strategy and a general partner at Ego Death Capital, a venture fund investing in Bitcoin-related startups. With an engineering background, she provides macro investment research focusing on long-term structural trends in markets and technology. She has been a prominent voice in Bitcoin analysis since 2020 and offers both free and premium research services through her platform.
Jack Farley is the host of Monetary Matters podcast, focusing on macroeconomic analysis and financial markets. He conducts in-depth interviews with leading investors and economists, examining critical economic trends and policy implications for markets.
The American economy operates as a "two-speed" system where AI capital expenditure and fiscal deficits drive growth while most other sectors experience stagnation. (01:02) Without data center investments, GDP growth would be merely 0.1% instead of 4.1%. This creates dangerous dependencies where entire economic performance relies on continued AI investment momentum. Manufacturing PMIs have remained flat for years despite reshoring headlines, and commercial real estate faces a "slow moving train wreck." The implications are profound: if AI investment slows, the underlying economic weakness becomes fully exposed, potentially triggering broader economic challenges.
While AI represents genuine technological transformation, current investment patterns show bubble characteristics that threaten sustainability. (06:51) Many AI companies remain unprofitable with no clear path to profitability, essentially "selling $20 bills for $10." The fundamental difference between data center AI and portable AI creates scaling limitations - data centers require megawatts of power while human brains operate on 20 watts. This energy constraint means widespread robotics deployment faces significant hurdles. However, white-collar automation through data centers remains highly viable, suggesting selective rather than universal AI success.
Bitcoin's difficulty adjustment mechanism provides automatic economic equilibrium that addresses mining profitability concerns. (45:05) Every 2,016 blocks (approximately two weeks), the network adjusts mining difficulty based on actual mining activity. When mining becomes unprofitable and miners shut down, difficulty decreases, making remaining miners more profitable. This creates a permanent feedback loop ensuring network security. Successful miners increasingly focus on "stranded energy" - natural gas flaring at oil wells, excess solar during peak production, or other nearly free energy sources. This system ensures Bitcoin's long-term viability regardless of price fluctuations.
The Fed is transitioning from quantitative tightening to gradual balance sheet expansion, marking a significant monetary policy shift. (24:15) Recent liquidity friction, including 10-20 basis point spreads in secured overnight financing rates, indicates the Fed is approaching the limits of quantitative tightening. Unlike previous cycles, balance sheet expansion will occur while interest rates remain positive, representing a new monetary policy framework. This shift toward "fiscal dominance" means the Fed will accommodate government spending needs through liquidity provision, potentially supporting asset prices while complicating inflation management. The change represents a structural accommodation of large fiscal deficits.
Gold's surge above $2,700 reflects structural demand for neutral reserve assets in an increasingly multipolar world, while Bitcoin faces consolidation pressures. (72:03) Sovereign buying and institutional recognition of persistent fiscal deficits drive gold demand as a hedge against currency debasement and asset confiscation risks. Bitcoin, despite being a superior long-term store of value, faces headwinds from exhausted crypto narratives and the unwinding of election-based speculation about strategic reserves. Gold benefits from being a risk-off asset during economic weakness outside AI, while Bitcoin remains grouped with risk-on assets. This divergence reflects different investor bases and time horizons rather than fundamental value differences.