Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
In this Decoder episode, Jake Kastrenakes interviews Verge Transportation editor Andy Hawkins about the federal EV tax credit that expired on September 30th and its massive implications for the American auto industry. (04:47) The $7,500 credit was designed to incentivize Americans to buy electric vehicles, prop up domestic EV manufacturing, and help the US compete with China's growing dominance in affordable EVs. (02:17) After record EV sales in August 2025, the credit's elimination under the Trump administration has left automakers scrambling to maintain sales without government support. The conversation explores how companies like Ford and GM are desperately trying workarounds, why EVs still lose money for most manufacturers, and what the future holds for an industry that must now compete purely on merit.
Executive editor at The Verge, filling in as host for this episode. Kastrenakes brings extensive experience covering technology and business topics, providing thoughtful analysis of complex policy and industry dynamics.
Transportation editor at The Verge with deep expertise in the automotive industry and electric vehicle market. Hawkins covers the intersection of technology, policy, and transportation, offering authoritative insights into the evolving EV landscape and its broader implications for American manufacturing.
The federal EV tax credit wasn't just a nice-to-have incentive—it was absolutely critical for the industry's success. (08:00) Andy explains that automakers "relied a lot on these credits" to get consumers beyond early adopters into dealerships. The credit helped bridge the gap between expensive EV production costs and consumer price sensitivity. Without it, companies like GM are taking massive write-downs, with GM announcing a $1.6 billion loss just as the credit expired. (09:17) This demonstrates how dependent the industry had become on government support to make their business models work.
The Trump administration's elimination of the EV credit represents what Andy calls "cutting off your nose to spite your face" for an administration claiming to support American manufacturing. (10:05) Despite the credit's success in encouraging domestic production and job creation in red states like Kentucky, Georgia, and Tennessee, political opposition to climate initiatives outweighed manufacturing benefits. This shows how ideological battles can override practical economic policy, leaving American companies at a disadvantage against Chinese competitors who continue receiving government support.
The credit's expiration forces a complete rethinking of EV manufacturing. (33:48) Ford CEO Jim Farley acknowledged the "huge risk" involved in developing new manufacturing methods, including unicasting and smaller battery designs. Companies must learn from Chinese manufacturers like BYD, whose smaller 50-kilowatt hour batteries could reduce costs by $30,000 or more. (35:06) This isn't just about incremental improvements—it requires wholesale reinvention of the production process, similar to Henry Ford's assembly line revolution.
American automakers made a strategic error by creating electric versions of their biggest, most expensive vehicles like the Ford F-150 Lightning and electric Hummer. (24:10) Andy explains this approach assumed consumers needed familiar, comfortable vehicles to make the switch, but "big gas guzzling trucks and SUVs" translated to EVs that were "too heavy," "too big," and required batteries that were "too much." This premium-first strategy worked for Tesla's early adopters but failed to capture mainstream, price-sensitive consumers who represent the bulk of the market.
Despite short-term challenges, the credit's elimination may ultimately benefit EVs by removing political stigma. (31:08) Andy notes that "EVs may carry less baggage, political baggage going forward" since politicians can no longer attack them as symbols of "government overreach" or an "EV mandate that never existed." Consumer surveys show EV owners don't intend to return to gas vehicles, appreciating lower operating costs and maintenance requirements. (32:47) This suggests that once political interference is removed, EVs can succeed based on their inherent advantages as superior transportation technology.