Search for a command to run...

Timestamps are as accurate as they can be but may be slightly off. We encourage you to listen to the full context.
Marc Andreessen joins a16z for a comprehensive AMA covering the AI revolution's trajectory and implications. He describes AI as the biggest technological revolution of his lifetime—larger than the Internet—comparing it to the steam engine and electricity in terms of transformative impact. (03:35) The discussion reveals that we're witnessing an 80-year journey from theoretical neural networks (first paper published in 1943) finally crystallizing into practical applications, with Silicon Valley now reallocating massive talent and capital toward this new wave.
Co-founder and General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), one of Silicon Valley's most influential venture capital firms. Andreessen previously co-founded Netscape, which pioneered the commercial Internet browser, and has been at the forefront of multiple technology waves including the Internet, mobile, cloud, and now AI. He's known for his prescient insights on technological shifts and has been investing in and analyzing emerging technologies for over three decades.
General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz who leads conversations and interviews for the firm. She works closely with portfolio companies and focuses on helping entrepreneurs navigate complex strategic and operational challenges in rapidly evolving technology markets.
AI pricing is falling "much faster than Moore's Law" with all input costs collapsing, creating hyper-deflation in per-unit costs. (13:48) This drives enormous demand growth through elasticity, while the underlying infrastructure build-out (hundreds of billions in data centers, chips, etc.) will further reduce costs. The magic of tokens-by-the-drink pricing means startups can access the world's most sophisticated AI capabilities with virtually no fixed costs, enabling rapid experimentation and scaling. This democratization of intelligence represents a fundamental shift from the traditional computer industry model.
The AI industry is pioneering more creative pricing models than previous technology waves, moving beyond simple seat-based SaaS models. (41:45) Companies are exploring value-based pricing where AI capabilities are priced as a percentage of business value delivered—such as pricing AI that performs the job of a doctor, lawyer, or coder based on the value of that human role. High prices can actually benefit customers by enabling vendors to invest more in R&D and product improvements, creating a virtuous cycle of innovation.
The fundamental tension between large proprietary models and smaller open-source alternatives continues to evolve rapidly. (47:21) Leading capabilities typically emerge in large models first, but open-source models achieve equivalent performance within 6-12 months at much smaller scale and cost. This creates a dynamic where companies can start with cloud-based intelligence and gradually move to local deployment, while open-source proliferates knowledge and accelerates the training of new AI researchers globally.
Chinese companies like DeepSeek, Qwen (Alibaba), and Kimi have rapidly caught up to American AI capabilities, often releasing powerful open-source models. (27:55) This competition has actually improved the US policy landscape by demonstrating that AI development is a "two-horse race" rather than American dominance, reducing the appetite for restrictive regulations that would handicap US development. The rapid catch-up by multiple players suggests that once capabilities are proven, they can be replicated relatively quickly even with fewer resources.
The emergence of 1,200+ AI bills across 50 states threatens to create a catastrophic regulatory patchwork that could cripple American AI development. (33:40) Some proposed state laws, like California's vetoed SB-1047, would have assigned downstream liability to open-source developers for any future misuse of their models—effectively killing academic research and startup innovation. The federal government needs to assert authority over interstate AI regulation to prevent this fragmentation, as AI is inherently national in scope.